StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs MEAN

Bootstrap vs MEAN

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
MEAN
MEAN
Stacks337
Followers617
Votes594
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks3.4K

Bootstrap vs MEAN: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, there are various tools and frameworks available to build dynamic and responsive websites. Two such popular options are Bootstrap and MEAN stack. Although both Bootstrap and MEAN stack serve different purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart. Let's explore these differences in detail.

  1. Bootstrap: Bootstrap is a widely used front-end framework that helps developers create responsive and visually appealing websites. It provides a collection of CSS and JavaScript components that can be easily implemented to achieve consistent designs across different devices and screen sizes. With Bootstrap, developers can save time and effort by utilizing pre-built templates, styles, and components. The framework also offers extensive documentation and a large active community for support and resources.

  2. MEAN stack: MEAN stack, on the other hand, is a full-stack JavaScript framework consisting of MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js. It is used for building dynamic web applications that rely on server-side scripting as well as client-side functionality. MEAN stack allows developers to use a single programming language (JavaScript) throughout the entire application development process. This results in enhanced productivity and smoother workflow. With MEAN stack, you can leverage the power of NoSQL databases, asynchronous programming, and real-time communication.

  3. Key Difference 1: Use Case: The first major difference between Bootstrap and MEAN stack lies in their use case. Bootstrap is primarily focused on front-end development and provides ready-to-use components for creating responsive user interfaces. It is suitable for developers who want to quickly design visually appealing websites without diving deep into backend functionalities. On the other hand, MEAN stack is a comprehensive full-stack framework that covers both frontend and backend development aspects. It is best suited for developers who are looking to build dynamic web applications with complex business logic and server-side operations.

  4. Key Difference 2: Technology Stack: Another important distinction between Bootstrap and MEAN stack is their technology stack. Bootstrap is not tied to any specific technology or programming language. It can be used with any backend technology or CMS (Content Management System). In contrast, MEAN stack is built entirely on JavaScript technologies. It leverages MongoDB for the database, Express.js for the backend web application framework, AngularJS for the frontend framework, and Node.js as the runtime environment. This unified stack allows for seamless integration and collaboration between different parts of the application.

  5. Key Difference 3: Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, Bootstrap is relatively easier to learn and implement. It comes with a vast library of pre-built styles and components that can be easily customized and utilized. Bootstrap also offers comprehensive documentation and a wide range of online resources, making it accessible to developers of all skill levels. MEAN stack, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve. Since it involves multiple technologies and frameworks, developers need to have a solid understanding of each component and how they integrate with each other. It requires proficiency in JavaScript, database management, server-side programming, and front-end development.

  6. Key Difference 4: Flexibility and Customization: Bootstrap provides a high level of flexibility and customization options. Developers can choose from a variety of pre-designed themes and modify them according to their specific requirements. Bootstrap also allows for easy customization of individual components and styling. MEAN stack, on the other hand, offers greater flexibility in terms of architecture and scalability. Developers have more control over the entire application stack and can customize it according to their specific needs. MEAN stack also allows for the use of existing third-party libraries and modules for additional functionality.

In summary, Bootstrap is a front-end framework that focuses on creating responsive and visually appealing websites, while MEAN stack is a full-stack JavaScript framework for building dynamic web applications. Bootstrap is best suited for frontend developers looking for a quick and easy way to design websites, while MEAN stack is ideal for developers who require both frontend and backend functionalities in a unified JavaScript stack. The key differences between Bootstrap and MEAN stack lie in their use case, technology stack, learning curve, and level of flexibility and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, MEAN

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
MEAN
MEAN

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
337
Followers
13.2K
Followers
617
Votes
7.7K
Votes
594
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 86
    Javascript
  • 62
    Easy
  • 58
    Nosql
  • 52
    Great community
  • 50
    Modularity
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, MEAN?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase