StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Bosun vs Sysdig

Bosun vs Sysdig

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bosun
Bosun
Stacks18
Followers52
Votes3
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks492
Sysdig
Sysdig
Stacks80
Followers150
Votes15
GitHub Stars8.1K
Forks748

Bosun vs Sysdig: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Bosun is a monitoring and alerting system developed by Stack Exchange, which is written in Go and utilizes OpenTSDB for storage, while Sysdig is a container visibility and troubleshooting tool designed for Docker and Kubernetes environments, built in C++ and Lua with a focus on container-level performance data.
  2. Monitoring Scope: Bosun primarily focuses on general system and network monitoring with a wide array of integrations, including Nagios, while Sysdig specializes in monitoring containerized environments providing deep visibility into containers, microservices, applications, and their dependencies.
  3. Alerting Mechanism: Bosun offers a flexible alerting system allowing for complex alert specifications and dynamic templates for notifications, while Sysdig provides predefined alerts based on best practices for container monitoring but also permits custom alert creation.
  4. Data Collection: Bosun relies on collectors that gather data from various sources, including SQL databases and APIs, to populate its storage layer, whereas Sysdig utilizes a lightweight agent deployed on hosts and containers that collects low-overhead performance data for analysis.
  5. User Interface: Bosun offers a web-based user interface for monitoring, alerting, and visualization tasks with a focus on time series data exploration, while Sysdig provides a unified command-line interface and web dashboard for monitoring and troubleshooting containerized environments with a more granular level of detail.
  6. Scalability: Bosun may require additional infrastructure for scaling out horizontally due to its architecture, whereas Sysdig is designed to scale effortlessly in cloud-native environments with minimal impact on performance.

In Summary, Bosun and Sysdig differ in terms of their architecture, monitoring scope, alerting mechanism, data collection methods, user interface, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bosun, Sysdig

Raja Subramaniam
Raja Subramaniam

Aug 27, 2019

Needs adviceonPrometheusPrometheusKubernetesKubernetesSysdigSysdig

We have Prometheus as a monitoring engine as a part of our stack which contains Kubernetes cluster, container images and other open source tools. Also, I am aware that Sysdig can be integrated with Prometheus but I really wanted to know whether Sysdig or sysdig+prometheus will make better monitoring solution.

779k views779k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bosun
Bosun
Sysdig
Sysdig

Bosun is an open-source, MIT licensed, monitoring and alerting system by Stack Exchange. It has an expressive domain specific language for evaluating alerts and creating detailed notifications. It also lets you test your alerts against history for a faster development experience.

Sysdig is open source, system-level exploration: capture system state and activity from a running Linux instance, then save, filter and analyze. Sysdig is scriptable in Lua and includes a command line interface and a powerful interactive UI, csysdig, that runs in your terminal. Think of sysdig as strace + tcpdump + htop + iftop + lsof + awesome sauce. With state of the art container visibility on top.

Save time by testing alerting against historical data and reduce alert noise before an alert goes into production;Supports querying OpenTSDB, Graphite, and Logstash-Elasticsearch;Create notifications using Bosun's template language: include graphs, tables, and contextual information
Real-Time Dashboard; Historical Replay; Dynamic Topology; Intelligent Alerting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
8.1K
GitHub Forks
492
GitHub Forks
748
Stacks
18
Stacks
80
Followers
52
Followers
150
Votes
3
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Powerful alerting
  • 1
    Query multiple tsdbs
  • 1
    Query Elasticsearch
Pros
  • 5
    Monitoring
  • 5
    Powerful web app
  • 5
    Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Bosun, Sysdig?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana