StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. Boxfuse vs Flatpak

Boxfuse vs Flatpak

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Boxfuse
Boxfuse
Stacks4
Followers10
Votes0
Flatpak
Flatpak
Stacks7
Followers9
Votes0

Boxfuse vs Flatpak: What are the differences?

Boxfuse: Immutable Infrastructure Made Easy. It generates minimal images for your application in seconds. They boot directly on virtual hardware. There is no classic OS and no container runtime; Flatpak: Build and distribute applications on Linux. It is a next-generation technology for building and distributing desktop applications on Linux.

Boxfuse and Flatpak can be primarily classified as "Virtual Machine Platforms & Containers" tools.

Some of the features offered by Boxfuse are:

  • Images measured in MB, not GB
  • Deep and powerful integration
  • Secure and production-ready by design

On the other hand, Flatpak provides the following key features:

  • Build for every distro - Create one app and distribute it to the entire Linux desktop market.
  • Stable platforms - Runtimes provide platforms of common libraries that you can depend on.
  • Consistent environments - Develop and test your application in an environment that’s identical to the one users have.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Boxfuse
Boxfuse
Flatpak
Flatpak

It generates minimal images for your application in seconds. They boot directly on virtual hardware. There is no classic OS and no container runtime.

It is a next-generation technology for building and distributing desktop applications on Linux

Images measured in MB, not GB; Deep and powerful integration; Secure and production-ready by design; Made for Continuous Deployment
Build for every distro - Create one app and distribute it to the entire Linux desktop market.; Stable platforms - Runtimes provide platforms of common libraries that you can depend on.; Consistent environments - Develop and test your application in an environment that’s identical to the one users have.; Full control over dependencies - Flatpak makes it easy to bundle your own libraries as part of your app.; Easy build tools - Flatpak’s build tools are simple and easy to use, and come with a full set of documentation.; Future-proof builds - Flatpak apps continue to be compatible with new versions of Linux distributions.; Distribution made easy - Make your app available to a rapidly growing audience of Flatpak users, with Flathub.; An independent project - Flatpak is developed by an independent community, with no lock-in to a single vendor.
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
7
Followers
10
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
GitHub
GitHub
Gradle
Gradle
Scala
Scala
Groovy
Groovy
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Linux
Linux
Golang
Golang
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Boxfuse, Flatpak?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Studio 3T

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenVZ

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

SmartOS

SmartOS

It combines the capabilities you get from a lightweight container OS, optimized to deliver containers, with the robust security, networking and storage capabilities you’ve come to expect and depend on from a hardware hypervisor.

Clear Containers

Clear Containers

We set out to build Clear Containers by leveraging the isolation of virtual-machine technology along with the deployment benefits of containers. As part of this, we let go of the "generic PC hardware" notion traditionally associated with virtual machines; we're not going to pretend to be a standard PC that is compatible with just about any OS on the planet.

Lima

Lima

It launches Linux virtual machines with automatic file sharing, port forwarding, and containerd. It can be considered as some sort of unofficial "macOS subsystem for Linux", or "containerd for Mac". It is expected to be used on macOS hosts, but can be used on Linux hosts as well. It may work on NetBSD and Windows hosts as well.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana