Capacitor vs Framework7

Overview

Framework7

Stacks141

Followers331

Votes171

Capacitor

Stacks287

Followers326

Votes2

GitHub Stars14.2K

Forks1.1K

Capacitor vs Framework7: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Capacitor and Framework7. Capacitor and Framework7 are both popular tools used in web development, but they have distinct features and functionalities. Let's explore the differences between them in the following paragraphs.

Platform Support: Capacitor is a cross-platform app runtime that supports multiple platforms such as iOS, Android, and the web. It allows developers to build apps using web technologies and then run them on various platforms. On the other hand, Framework7 is primarily focused on building iOS and Android apps and does not support web deployment.
Architecture: Capacitor follows a plugin-based architecture, where developers can leverage a wide range of plugins to access native device features and functionalities. This allows developers to easily integrate native functionality into their Capactior apps. Framework7, on the other hand, is based on a UI component library that provides a set of pre-designed UI elements and widgets for creating mobile apps.
Development Approach: Capacitor emphasizes a hybrid development approach, where web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are used to build cross-platform mobile apps. It is designed to bridge the gap between web and native app development. Framework7, on the other hand, follows a native development approach, where developers can write their app code using web technologies but still have the look and feel of a native app.
UI Customization: Capacitor provides a limited set of UI components and relies on existing web technologies for UI customization. Developers can customize the UI of their Capacitor apps using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. In contrast, Framework7 offers a rich set of pre-designed UI components and provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to create highly customized and visually appealing mobile apps.
Learning Curve: Capacitor has a relatively lower learning curve compared to Framework7. Since Capacitor is built on top of web technologies, developers familiar with web development can easily transition to building mobile apps using Capacitor. Framework7, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve as it requires understanding the concepts and principles of native app development.
Community and Ecosystem: Capacitor benefits from the wider ecosystem of web development, as it allows developers to leverage existing web libraries, frameworks, and resources. It has a growing community and a vast number of resources available for support and assistance. Framework7, on the other hand, has a dedicated community focused on mobile app development, with a specific focus on iOS and Android app development.

In summary, Capacitor and Framework7 differ in platform support, architecture, development approach, UI customization, learning curve, and community/ecosystem focus.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Framework7	Capacitor
It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.	Invoke Native SDKs on iOS, Android, Electron, and the Web with one code base. Optimized for Ionic Framework apps, or use with any web app framework.`
iOS Specific;UI Components;Swipe Actions;Easy To Customize;Native Scrolling;Multiple Views	Build web apps that run equally well on iOS, Android, Electron, and as Progressive Web Apps; Access the full Native SDK on each platform, and easily deploy to App Stores (and the web!); It provides native functionality for web apps, and is optimized for Ionic Framework; Build apps with standardized web technologies that will work for decades, and easily reach users on the app stores and the mobile web; Easily add custom native functionality with a simple Plugin API, or use existing Cordova plugins with our compatibility layer; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 14.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 141	Stacks 287
Followers 331	Followers 326
Votes 171	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free and open source 20 Well designed 17 Material design 15 Lots of ready-to-use ui elements, easy to customize 12 Best performance Cons 1 Not suitable for high performance in PWA. desktop apps	Pros 1 Full compatible with ios 1 Modern
Integrations
React Vue.js Svelte	Electron Apache Cordova Ionic iOS Android OS

What are some alternatives to Framework7, Capacitor?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

Capacitor vs Framework7: What are the differences?

Introduction

Platform Support: Capacitor is a cross-platform app runtime that supports multiple platforms such as iOS, Android, and the web. It allows developers to build apps using web technologies and then run them on various platforms. On the other hand, Framework7 is primarily focused on building iOS and Android apps and does not support web deployment.
Architecture: Capacitor follows a plugin-based architecture, where developers can leverage a wide range of plugins to access native device features and functionalities. This allows developers to easily integrate native functionality into their Capactior apps. Framework7, on the other hand, is based on a UI component library that provides a set of pre-designed UI elements and widgets for creating mobile apps.
Development Approach: Capacitor emphasizes a hybrid development approach, where web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are used to build cross-platform mobile apps. It is designed to bridge the gap between web and native app development. Framework7, on the other hand, follows a native development approach, where developers can write their app code using web technologies but still have the look and feel of a native app.
UI Customization: Capacitor provides a limited set of UI components and relies on existing web technologies for UI customization. Developers can customize the UI of their Capacitor apps using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. In contrast, Framework7 offers a rich set of pre-designed UI components and provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to create highly customized and visually appealing mobile apps.
Learning Curve: Capacitor has a relatively lower learning curve compared to Framework7. Since Capacitor is built on top of web technologies, developers familiar with web development can easily transition to building mobile apps using Capacitor. Framework7, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve as it requires understanding the concepts and principles of native app development.
Community and Ecosystem: Capacitor benefits from the wider ecosystem of web development, as it allows developers to leverage existing web libraries, frameworks, and resources. It has a growing community and a vast number of resources available for support and assistance. Framework7, on the other hand, has a dedicated community focused on mobile app development, with a specific focus on iOS and Android app development.

In summary, Capacitor and Framework7 differ in platform support, architecture, development approach, UI customization, learning curve, and community/ecosystem focus.

Capacitor vs Framework7

Overview