Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Capybara vs pytest: What are the differences?
- Installation: Capybara is primarily used with Ruby on Rails applications and requires additional setup compared to pytest, which is a testing framework for Python that can be easily installed using package managers like pip.
- Syntax: Capybara uses a DSL that closely mimics user interactions on a web browser, making it highly readable for writing functional tests, while pytest follows standard Python syntax and is more versatile for a wide range of testing scenarios.
- Focus: Capybara is specifically designed for acceptance testing and UI testing, providing high-level abstractions to interact with web pages, whereas pytest is a general-purpose testing tool that can be used for unit testing, integration testing, and more.
- Selectors: Capybara provides a range of powerful selector methods for locating and interacting with elements on a web page, making it easy to write expressive tests, whereas pytest relies on libraries like Selenium for similar functionality.
- Browser Compatibility: Capybara supports multiple drivers to interact with different browsers, making cross-browser testing easier, whereas pytest requires additional libraries or plugins to achieve similar browser compatibility.
- Community Support: Capybara has a strong community within the Ruby on Rails ecosystem, providing extensive documentation and resources, while pytest has a large community in the Python development world with a wealth of plugins and integrations.
In Summary, Capybara and pytest have key differences in terms of installation, syntax, focus, selectors, browser compatibility, and community support, catering to different testing needs in web development.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Capybara
Pros of pytest
Pros of Capybara
- Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps12
- Synchronous with Rack::Test2
- Fast with Rack::Test1
Pros of pytest
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Capybara
Cons of pytest
Cons of Capybara
- Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser1
Cons of pytest
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Capybara?
Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.
What is pytest?
A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Capybara and pytest as a desired skillset
What companies use Capybara?
What companies use pytest?
What companies use pytest?
See which teams inside your own company are using Capybara or pytest.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Capybara?
What tools integrate with pytest?
What tools integrate with Capybara?
What tools integrate with pytest?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+43 18
5235
What are some alternatives to Capybara and pytest?
Wombat
Automate your store in no time: Wombat is an ecommerce integration platform that quickly connects your storefront with all your favorite 3rd party services. Comprehensive enough for large ecommerce stores and easy enough for small merchants
Cucumber
Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
Anaconda
A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Quokka
You send great emails but sometimes it gets lost in a user’s inbox. Quokka shows a retargeting message to those who ignored your message so that they will never miss an important update from you.