Centreon vs Checkmk

Overview

Checkmk

Stacks77

Followers99

Votes0

Centreon

Stacks42

Followers84

Votes0

GitHub Stars136

Forks52

Centreon vs Checkmk: What are the differences?

Introduction

Centreon and Checkmk are two popular IT monitoring tools used by organizations to monitor their infrastructure and ensure its smooth functioning. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them.

Scalability: Centreon is known for its scalability and ability to monitor large infrastructures with thousands of devices. It offers distributed architecture and flexible deployment options, allowing organizations to scale their monitoring capabilities effectively. Checkmk, on the other hand, may face limitations in handling large-scale infrastructures, especially in its open-source version.
Ease of Use: Centreon provides a user-friendly web interface that simplifies the monitoring configuration process. It offers an intuitive graphical interface and drag-and-drop capabilities, making it easier for administrators to set up and manage monitoring rules. Checkmk, although powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive configuration options and complex interface.
Event Correlation: Centreon offers built-in event correlation capabilities that help identify the root causes of issues by analyzing different events and their relationships. This feature allows administrators to prioritize incidents and take appropriate actions quickly, reducing downtime. Checkmk, while it provides event handling capabilities, may have limitations in terms of advanced event correlation and analysis.
Monitoring Flexibility: Centreon supports a wide range of monitoring methods, including SNMP, NRPE, and SSH. It also offers support for custom plugins, enabling organizations to monitor various types of devices and applications. Checkmk, similarly, supports multiple monitoring methods, but its focus is primarily on agent-based monitoring, which may limit its flexibility in certain scenarios.
Dashboard and Reporting: Centreon provides customizable dashboards and reporting features, allowing administrators to visualize and analyze monitoring data effectively. It provides real-time graphs, charts, and drill-down capabilities to explore performance metrics in detail. Checkmk, while it offers dashboard and reporting capabilities, may not provide the same level of customization and visualization options as Centreon.
Community and Support: Centreon has a strong and active community of users and developers who regularly contribute to its open-source ecosystem. This community provides valuable resources, plugins, and support for Centreon users. Checkmk also has a community edition; however, the support and community engagement may not be as extensive as in the case of Centreon.

In summary, Centreon offers scalability, ease of use, event correlation, monitoring flexibility, customizable dashboards, and a strong community support. Checkmk may have limitations in terms of scalability and complex configuration, but it excels in agent-based monitoring and offers advanced event handling capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Checkmk, Centreon

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Checkmk	Centreon
Checkmk is a comprehensive solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors.	It is a network, system, applicative supervision and monitoring tool. It is one of the most flexible and powerful monitoring softwares on the market; it is absolutely free and Open Souce.
State-based monitoring; Log- and event-based monitoring;Graphing and analytics;Customizable GUI;Reporting;Business Intelligence;Hardware and software inventory;Notifications and alert handler;Rule-based configuration, auto-discovery and agent deployment; Scalability; User Management with LDAP/Active Directory;Predictive Monitoring; Capacity Management; Single Sign-On; Dynamic host configuration	Supervision of hybrid infrastructures, from one end to the other;Open and flexible architecture that fits your organization;Open-source solution, downloadable for free; The supervision of dynamic infrastructures, with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 136
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 52
Stacks 77	Stacks 42
Followers 99	Followers 84
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon RDS Amazon CloudFront Amazon ElastiCache AWS Lambda Azure Active Directory Cassandra Azure Storage Amazon S3 Azure Monitor Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to Checkmk, Centreon?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Centreon vs Checkmk: What are the differences?

Introduction

Scalability: Centreon is known for its scalability and ability to monitor large infrastructures with thousands of devices. It offers distributed architecture and flexible deployment options, allowing organizations to scale their monitoring capabilities effectively. Checkmk, on the other hand, may face limitations in handling large-scale infrastructures, especially in its open-source version.
Ease of Use: Centreon provides a user-friendly web interface that simplifies the monitoring configuration process. It offers an intuitive graphical interface and drag-and-drop capabilities, making it easier for administrators to set up and manage monitoring rules. Checkmk, although powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive configuration options and complex interface.
Event Correlation: Centreon offers built-in event correlation capabilities that help identify the root causes of issues by analyzing different events and their relationships. This feature allows administrators to prioritize incidents and take appropriate actions quickly, reducing downtime. Checkmk, while it provides event handling capabilities, may have limitations in terms of advanced event correlation and analysis.
Monitoring Flexibility: Centreon supports a wide range of monitoring methods, including SNMP, NRPE, and SSH. It also offers support for custom plugins, enabling organizations to monitor various types of devices and applications. Checkmk, similarly, supports multiple monitoring methods, but its focus is primarily on agent-based monitoring, which may limit its flexibility in certain scenarios.
Dashboard and Reporting: Centreon provides customizable dashboards and reporting features, allowing administrators to visualize and analyze monitoring data effectively. It provides real-time graphs, charts, and drill-down capabilities to explore performance metrics in detail. Checkmk, while it offers dashboard and reporting capabilities, may not provide the same level of customization and visualization options as Centreon.
Community and Support: Centreon has a strong and active community of users and developers who regularly contribute to its open-source ecosystem. This community provides valuable resources, plugins, and support for Centreon users. Checkmk also has a community edition; however, the support and community engagement may not be as extensive as in the case of Centreon.

Centreon vs Checkmk

Overview

Centreon vs Checkmk: What are the differences?