Centreon vs Nagios

Overview

Nagios

Stacks811

Followers1.1K

Votes102

GitHub Stars57

Forks38

Centreon

Stacks42

Followers84

Votes0

GitHub Stars136

Forks52

Centreon vs Nagios: What are the differences?

Introduction: Centreon is an open-source monitoring solution that provides comprehensive insights into the performance and availability of IT infrastructures. On the other hand, Nagios is a widely-used open-source monitoring tool designed to monitor network services, hosts, and devices.

Scalability: Centreon offers better scalability than Nagios. With Centreon, you can easily monitor a large number of hosts and services without affecting the overall performance. Nagios, on the other hand, can face performance issues when monitoring a large number of hosts and services.
User Interface: Centreon provides a more user-friendly and intuitive web-based interface compared to Nagios. The Centreon interface allows for easy navigation and configuration of the monitoring system. Nagios, while powerful, has a more complex and less intuitive interface.
Automation and Integration: Centreon offers more automation and integration capabilities than Nagios. Centreon provides an API and a wide range of plugins that allow for seamless integration with other systems and automation tools. Nagios also supports integration but may require more manual configuration and customization.
Reporting and Visualization: Centreon provides extensive reporting and visualization features, allowing users to generate customized reports and visualize the monitoring data in various graphical formats. Nagios, on the other hand, offers limited reporting and visualization capabilities, requiring additional plugins or customization to achieve similar functionality.
Enterprise Features: Centreon offers additional enterprise features such as multiple dashboards, advanced reporting, distributed architecture, and high-availability options. These features are not available or limited in Nagios' core version, requiring additional plugins or customization.
Ease of Configuration and Management: Centreon provides a more user-friendly and centralized configuration and management interface compared to Nagios. Centreon allows for easier setup, monitoring, and management of hosts, services, and notifications. Nagios, while flexible, can be more complex and time-consuming to configure and manage.

In summary, Centreon offers better scalability, a more user-friendly interface, advanced automation and integration capabilities, extensive reporting and visualization features, additional enterprise features, and easier configuration and management compared to Nagios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Nagios, Centreon

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Matthias

Teamlead IT at NanoTemper Technologies

Jun 11, 2020

Decided

free open source
modern interface and architecture
large community
extendable I knew Nagios for decades but it was really outdated (by its architecture) at some point. That's why Icinga started first as a fork, not with Icinga2 it is completely built from scratch but backward-compatible with Nagios plugins. Now it has reached a state with which I am confident.

142k views142k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nagios	Centreon
Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.	It is a network, system, applicative supervision and monitoring tool. It is one of the most flexible and powerful monitoring softwares on the market; it is absolutely free and Open Souce.
Monitor your entire IT infrastructure;Spot problems before they occur;Know immediately when problems arise;Share availability data with stakeholders;Detect security breaches;Plan and budget for IT upgrades;Reduce downtime and business losses	Supervision of hybrid infrastructures, from one end to the other;Open and flexible architecture that fits your organization;Open-source solution, downloadable for free; The supervision of dynamic infrastructures, with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars 57	GitHub Stars 136
GitHub Forks 38	GitHub Forks 52
Stacks 811	Stacks 42
Followers 1.1K	Followers 84
Votes 102	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 53 It just works 28 The standard 12 Customizable 8 The Most flexible monitoring system 1 Huge stack of free checks/plugins to choose from	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon RDS Amazon CloudFront Amazon ElastiCache AWS Lambda Azure Active Directory Cassandra Azure Storage Amazon S3 Azure Monitor Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to Nagios, Centreon?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Centreon vs Nagios: What are the differences?

Scalability: Centreon offers better scalability than Nagios. With Centreon, you can easily monitor a large number of hosts and services without affecting the overall performance. Nagios, on the other hand, can face performance issues when monitoring a large number of hosts and services.
User Interface: Centreon provides a more user-friendly and intuitive web-based interface compared to Nagios. The Centreon interface allows for easy navigation and configuration of the monitoring system. Nagios, while powerful, has a more complex and less intuitive interface.
Automation and Integration: Centreon offers more automation and integration capabilities than Nagios. Centreon provides an API and a wide range of plugins that allow for seamless integration with other systems and automation tools. Nagios also supports integration but may require more manual configuration and customization.
Reporting and Visualization: Centreon provides extensive reporting and visualization features, allowing users to generate customized reports and visualize the monitoring data in various graphical formats. Nagios, on the other hand, offers limited reporting and visualization capabilities, requiring additional plugins or customization to achieve similar functionality.
Enterprise Features: Centreon offers additional enterprise features such as multiple dashboards, advanced reporting, distributed architecture, and high-availability options. These features are not available or limited in Nagios' core version, requiring additional plugins or customization.
Ease of Configuration and Management: Centreon provides a more user-friendly and centralized configuration and management interface compared to Nagios. Centreon allows for easier setup, monitoring, and management of hosts, services, and notifications. Nagios, while flexible, can be more complex and time-consuming to configure and manage.

Centreon vs Nagios

Overview