Centreon vs OpenNMS

Overview

OpenNMS

Stacks2

Followers9

Votes0

Centreon

Stacks42

Followers84

Votes0

GitHub Stars136

Forks52

Centreon vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Deployment: Centreon is known for its easy installation and deployment process, which is well-suited for various sizes of organizations. On the other hand, OpenNMS offers a more complex deployment process, requiring more technical knowledge and expertise for setup and configuration.
Monitoring Capabilities: Centreon provides a user-friendly interface with a wide range of monitoring capabilities, making it easier for users to set up and manage monitoring for their IT infrastructure. In contrast, OpenNMS is known for its scalability and robustness in handling large-scale networks and complex environments.
Alerting and Notifications: Centreon offers flexible alerting and notification features, allowing users to customize alerts based on specific criteria and thresholds. OpenNMS also provides alerting capabilities, but it may require more configuration and setup compared to Centreon.
Community Support: Centreon has a vibrant community that actively contributes to the platform with plugins, extensions, and support resources. OpenNMS also has a strong community presence, but it may not be as extensive or active as the Centreon community in terms of user engagement and support.
Cost: Centreon offers both open-source and enterprise versions, providing users with flexibility in choosing a solution that fits their budget and requirements. OpenNMS, on the other hand, is open-source with no enterprise version, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations looking for a free monitoring solution.
User Interface: Centreon is lauded for its intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it simple for users to monitor and manage their IT infrastructure. OpenNMS, while powerful in its monitoring capabilities, has a more complex and technical interface that may require a learning curve for new users.

In Summary, the key differences between Centreon and OpenNMS lie in their deployment ease, monitoring capabilities, alerting options, community support, cost structure, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on OpenNMS, Centreon

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

OpenNMS	Centreon
The world's first enterprise-grade network management platform developed under the Open Source model	It is a network, system, applicative supervision and monitoring tool. It is one of the most flexible and powerful monitoring softwares on the market; it is absolutely free and Open Souce.
-	Supervision of hybrid infrastructures, from one end to the other;Open and flexible architecture that fits your organization;Open-source solution, downloadable for free; The supervision of dynamic infrastructures, with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 136
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 52
Stacks 2	Stacks 42
Followers 9	Followers 84
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon RDS Amazon CloudFront Amazon ElastiCache AWS Lambda Azure Active Directory Cassandra Azure Storage Amazon S3 Azure Monitor Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to OpenNMS, Centreon?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Centreon vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Deployment: Centreon is known for its easy installation and deployment process, which is well-suited for various sizes of organizations. On the other hand, OpenNMS offers a more complex deployment process, requiring more technical knowledge and expertise for setup and configuration.
Monitoring Capabilities: Centreon provides a user-friendly interface with a wide range of monitoring capabilities, making it easier for users to set up and manage monitoring for their IT infrastructure. In contrast, OpenNMS is known for its scalability and robustness in handling large-scale networks and complex environments.
Alerting and Notifications: Centreon offers flexible alerting and notification features, allowing users to customize alerts based on specific criteria and thresholds. OpenNMS also provides alerting capabilities, but it may require more configuration and setup compared to Centreon.
Community Support: Centreon has a vibrant community that actively contributes to the platform with plugins, extensions, and support resources. OpenNMS also has a strong community presence, but it may not be as extensive or active as the Centreon community in terms of user engagement and support.
Cost: Centreon offers both open-source and enterprise versions, providing users with flexibility in choosing a solution that fits their budget and requirements. OpenNMS, on the other hand, is open-source with no enterprise version, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations looking for a free monitoring solution.
User Interface: Centreon is lauded for its intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it simple for users to monitor and manage their IT infrastructure. OpenNMS, while powerful in its monitoring capabilities, has a more complex and technical interface that may require a learning curve for new users.

In Summary, the key differences between Centreon and OpenNMS lie in their deployment ease, monitoring capabilities, alerting options, community support, cost structure, and user interface design.

Centreon vs OpenNMS

Overview