StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Chakra UI vs Tailwind CSS

Chakra UI vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245
Chakra UI
Chakra UI
Stacks217
Followers297
Votes18
GitHub Stars39.9K
Forks3.5K

Chakra UI vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Chakra UI and Tailwind CSS are both popular frameworks used in web development to build user interfaces. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Component Library vs. Utility-First: Chakra UI is a component library that provides pre-built UI components with predefined styles and functionality, making it easier to build consistent user interfaces. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS takes a utility-first approach, providing a set of utility classes that can be combined to create custom UI components.

  2. Design System vs. Atomic CSS: Chakra UI follows a design system approach, offering out-of-the-box designs and customizable components that align with specific design principles. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, uses Atomic CSS, where styles are defined using small utility classes that can be combined to create bespoke designs.

  3. Flexibility vs. Opinionated: Chakra UI is more opinionated and provides a structured, opinionated setup for building user interfaces. It follows strict design guidelines and provides a consistent look and feel. In contrast, Tailwind CSS offers more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to create unique designs and styles based on their specific needs.

  4. Built-in Styling vs. Custom Styling: Chakra UI comes with default styling for its components, which can be easily modified using theme configuration. It provides a cohesive visual style out-of-the-box. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, requires developers to define their own custom styling for each element using utility classes and configuration files.

  5. Accessibility vs. Performance: Chakra UI focuses on accessibility and strives to build inclusive user interfaces by providing accessible components and enforcing best practices. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, prioritizes performance and aims to provide a lightweight CSS framework that allows for efficient rendering and fast load times.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both Chakra UI and Tailwind CSS have vibrant communities and ecosystems, but they differ in terms of popularity and adoption. Tailwind CSS has gained a significant following and has a large number of plugins, extensions, and integrations available. Chakra UI, although newer, is also growing in popularity and has an active community.

In summary, Chakra UI is a component library with predefined styles and a design system approach, while Tailwind CSS is a utility-first framework that allows for more flexibility and customization. Chakra UI offers built-in styling and focuses on accessibility, while Tailwind CSS prioritizes performance and provides a wide range of customization options. Both have active communities and ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Chakra UI
Chakra UI

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Ease of Styling; Flexible & composable; Dark Mode
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
39.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.5K
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
217
Followers
3.1K
Followers
297
Votes
245
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript Support
  • 4
    Accessibility
  • 4
    Responsiveness
  • 3
    Good documentation
Cons
  • 2
    Hard to customise
  • 1
    # of components
  • 1
    Inflexible token structure
  • 1
    Styling system
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to Tailwind CSS, Chakra UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase