Checkmk vs Sensu: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Installation and Deployment: Checkmk offers a simple setup process with fewer components needed, making it easier to deploy compared to Sensu, which requires more setup and configuration, especially for large-scale environments.
2. Monitoring Capabilities: Sensu provides more flexibility and extensibility in monitoring due to its dynamic nature and support for various plugins, whereas Checkmk offers built-in monitoring templates and predefined checks to streamline monitoring setup.
3. Scalability: Sensu is better suited for larger, dynamic environments with its distributed architecture and support for handling high volumes of monitoring data more efficiently, whereas Checkmk may struggle to scale seamlessly in complex setups.
4. Alerting and Notification: Checkmk provides a more user-friendly interface for managing alerts and notifications, making it easier for users to configure and customize alerting rules, while Sensu offers more advanced options for fine-tuning notification mechanisms.
5. Community and Support: Sensu has a more active and vibrant community with a stronger focus on open-source collaboration, providing users with extensive resources, plugins, and integrations, whereas Checkmk may have more limited community-driven development and support options.
6. Costs and Licensing: Sensu offers a more flexible licensing model with options for both open-source and commercial editions, while Checkmk leans more towards commercial licensing, which may impact the overall cost and access to certain features.

In Summary, Checkmk and Sensu differ in installation simplicity, monitoring capabilities, scalability, alerting options, community support, and licensing models.