Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cherokee

4
26
+ 1
4
Puma

839
264
+ 1
20
Add tool

Cherokee vs Puma: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Cherokee and Puma

Cherokee and Puma are both popular SUV models, but they have some key differences that set them apart. 

1. **Design and size**: One significant difference between Cherokee and Puma is their design and size. The Cherokee is generally larger and more rugged-looking, catering to drivers who prioritize off-road capabilities. On the other hand, the Puma tends to be sleeker and more compact, appealing to urban drivers looking for a stylish SUV.

2. **Technology features**: When it comes to technology features, Cherokee and Puma also differ. The Cherokee is known for its advanced off-road technology, including different drive modes and terrain management systems. In contrast, the Puma focuses more on smart connectivity features, such as advanced infotainment systems and driver-assist technologies for city driving.

3. **Performance and engine options**: Another key difference between Cherokee and Puma is their performance and engine options. The Cherokee often offers more powerful engine choices, suitable for towing or navigating challenging terrains. The Puma, on the other hand, may prioritize fuel efficiency and urban agility with smaller engine options.

4. **Price point and target market**: Cherokee and Puma also differ in terms of price point and target market. The Cherokee tends to be priced higher, targeting customers who value its larger size and off-road capabilities. In comparison, the Puma may be more affordable, attracting urban dwellers seeking a stylish and compact SUV for city driving.

5. **Interior and cargo space**: In terms of interior and cargo space, Cherokee and Puma offer distinct features. The Cherokee typically provides more interior room and cargo space, making it a practical choice for families or outdoor enthusiasts. Conversely, the Puma may offer a more refined and comfortable interior, suitable for daily commuting or city driving.

6. **Brand heritage and reputation**: Lastly, Cherokee and Puma have different brand heritages and reputations. Cherokee is rooted in Jeep's iconic legacy of producing rugged and reliable vehicles, appealing to adventure seekers and outdoor enthusiasts. In contrast, Puma is associated with Ford's reputation for innovation and modern design, attracting customers seeking a blend of style and technology in their SUV.

In Summary, Cherokee and Puma stand out from each other in terms of design, technology features, performance, price point, interior space, and brand reputation, catering to distinct preferences and lifestyles in the SUV market.
Advice on Cherokee and Puma
Mark Ndungu
Software Developer at Nouveta · | 4 upvotes · 33.8K views
Needs advice
on
PumaPuma
and
UnicornUnicorn

I have an integration service that pulls data from third party systems saves it and returns it to the user of the service. We can pull large data sets with the service and response JSON can go up to 5MB with gzip compression. I currently use Rails 6 and Ruby 2.7.2 and Puma web server. Slow clients tend to prevent other users from accessing the system. Am considering a switch to Unicorn.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
PumaPuma

Consider trying to use puma workers first. puma -w basically. That will launch multiple puma processes to manage the requests, like unicorn, but also run threads within those processes. You can turn the number of workers and number of threads to find the right memory footprint / request per second balance.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cherokee
Pros of Puma
  • 4
    The logo is cute
  • 4
    Free
  • 3
    Convenient
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Multithreaded
  • 2
    Consumes less memory than Unicorn
  • 2
    Default Rails server
  • 2
    First-class support for WebSockets
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Fast

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cherokee
Cons of Puma
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 0
      Uses `select` (limited client count)

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    67
    72
    66
    267
    75
    1.2K
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Cherokee?

    Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

    What is Puma?

    Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Cherokee and Puma as a desired skillset
    What companies use Cherokee?
    What companies use Puma?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Cherokee and Puma?
    Compass
    The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.
    NGINX
    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
    Apache HTTP Server
    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Firebase
    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
    See all alternatives