Puma vs. Cherokee

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Favorites

13

Favorites

0

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 267
  • 78
  • 864
  • 67
  • 70
  • 70

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

What is Cherokee?

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

Pros

Why do developers choose Puma?
Why do you like Puma?

Why do developers choose Cherokee?
Why do you like Cherokee?

Cons

What are the cons of using Puma?
No Cons submitted yet for Puma
Downsides of Puma?

What are the cons of using Cherokee?
No Cons submitted yet for Cherokee
Downsides of Cherokee?

Companies

What companies use Puma?
62 companies on StackShare use Puma
What companies use Cherokee?
1 companies on StackShare use Cherokee

What are some alternatives to Puma and Cherokee?

  • nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
  • Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996
  • Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows
  • Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

See all alternatives to Puma

Latest News

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is ...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these