Chocolatey vs pnpm

Overview

Chocolatey

Stacks96

Followers124

Votes0

pnpm

Stacks337

Followers101

Votes11

GitHub Stars33.1K

Forks1.2K

Chocolatey vs pnpm: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Chocolatey and pnpm

Package Management Systems: Chocolatey is a package manager for Windows, while pnpm is primarily used for managing Node.js packages. Chocolatey allows users to install and manage software applications on Windows systems conveniently, while pnpm is specifically designed for managing Node.js dependencies in projects.
Installation Method: Chocolatey uses PowerShell to install packages, making it suitable for Windows environments. In contrast, pnpm utilizes a unique algorithm that creates a symlink farm to store dependencies, reducing disk space usage significantly compared to traditional package managers like npm and Yarn.
Global vs. Local Installation: Chocolatey installs packages globally by default, making them accessible throughout the system. On the other hand, pnpm installs packages locally within each project directory, enforcing the isolation of dependencies and avoiding conflicts across projects.
Dependency Resolution: Chocolatey uses package files with version information to determine dependencies, while pnpm uses a single package.json file to define and resolve dependencies. This difference in resolution strategies affects the ease of managing and updating packages in both systems.
Tree-Shaking Support: pnpm offers built-in support for tree-shaking, a technique that eliminates unused code when bundling JavaScript applications. This feature enables developers to reduce the size of their applications significantly, improving performance and loading times.
Managing Node Modules: While Chocolatey focuses on managing system-level software installations, pnpm is specifically designed for managing Node modules within project directories. This specialization makes pnpm more suitable for Node.js developers working on multiple projects simultaneously.

In Summary, these key differences highlight the distinct purposes and capabilities of Chocolatey as a Windows package manager and pnpm as a Node.js dependency manager.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Chocolatey	pnpm
It is based on a developer-centric package manager called NuGet. Unlike manual installations, It adds, updates, and uninstalls programs in the background requiring very little user interaction.	It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.
works with all existing software installation technologies; works with runtime binaries and zip archives	Fast. As fast as npm and Yarn; Efficient. One version of a package is saved only ever once on a disk; Great for multi-package repositories (a.k.a. monorepos); See the recursive commands; Strict. A package can access only dependencies that are specified in its package.json; Deterministic. Has a lockfile called pnpm-lock.yaml; Works everywhere. Works on Windows, Linux and OS X; Aliases. Install different versions of the same package or import it using a different name.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 33.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 96	Stacks 337
Followers 124	Followers 101
Votes 0	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 4 Fast 3 Uses less disk space 2 Works as a Node.js package manager 1 Has a nice UI 1 Has CLI auto-completion
Integrations
Ansible Windows	Linux macOS Windows

What are some alternatives to Chocolatey, pnpm?

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

Chocolatey vs pnpm: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Chocolatey and pnpm

Package Management Systems: Chocolatey is a package manager for Windows, while pnpm is primarily used for managing Node.js packages. Chocolatey allows users to install and manage software applications on Windows systems conveniently, while pnpm is specifically designed for managing Node.js dependencies in projects.
Installation Method: Chocolatey uses PowerShell to install packages, making it suitable for Windows environments. In contrast, pnpm utilizes a unique algorithm that creates a symlink farm to store dependencies, reducing disk space usage significantly compared to traditional package managers like npm and Yarn.
Global vs. Local Installation: Chocolatey installs packages globally by default, making them accessible throughout the system. On the other hand, pnpm installs packages locally within each project directory, enforcing the isolation of dependencies and avoiding conflicts across projects.
Dependency Resolution: Chocolatey uses package files with version information to determine dependencies, while pnpm uses a single package.json file to define and resolve dependencies. This difference in resolution strategies affects the ease of managing and updating packages in both systems.
Tree-Shaking Support: pnpm offers built-in support for tree-shaking, a technique that eliminates unused code when bundling JavaScript applications. This feature enables developers to reduce the size of their applications significantly, improving performance and loading times.
Managing Node Modules: While Chocolatey focuses on managing system-level software installations, pnpm is specifically designed for managing Node modules within project directories. This specialization makes pnpm more suitable for Node.js developers working on multiple projects simultaneously.

In Summary, these key differences highlight the distinct purposes and capabilities of Chocolatey as a Windows package manager and pnpm as a Node.js dependency manager.

Chocolatey vs pnpm

Overview