Cisco ISE vs Forescout

Overview

Cisco ISE

Stacks19

Followers26

Votes0

Forescout

Stacks3

Followers17

Votes0

Cisco ISE vs Forescout: What are the differences?

Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout are both network access control solutions, but they have some key differences.

Management Interface: Cisco ISE provides a web-based management interface that allows administrators to configure policies, manage users, and monitor network activity. On the other hand, Forescout offers a centralized management platform that provides visibility and control over connected devices, regardless of their location.
Endpoint Visibility: While both solutions offer endpoint visibility, Forescout provides more granular information about connected devices. It can identify and classify devices based on their type, model, operating system, and more. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, focuses more on user authentication and authorization rather than detailed device visibility.
Integration Capabilities: Cisco ISE has extensive integration capabilities with other Cisco products like Cisco Identity Services Engine Integration, which allows for seamless integration with Cisco switches, routers, and firewalls. Forescout also offers integration with a wide range of third-party security and IT management tools.
Network Segmentation: Cisco ISE provides built-in network segmentation capabilities, allowing administrators to define and enforce security policies based on user roles, device type, and other factors. Forescout, on the other hand, offers more advanced network segmentation options, including the ability to dynamically create and enforce micro-segmentation policies based on real-time network conditions.
Threat Intelligence: Forescout incorporates threat intelligence feeds into its solution, allowing administrators to proactively identify and respond to security threats. It can detect and block known malicious activities based on real-time threat intelligence. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, relies more on its integration with other security tools, such as Cisco's Firepower Management Center, to detect and respond to threats.
Scalability: Cisco ISE is known for its scalability, capable of supporting large-scale deployments with thousands of users and devices. Forescout also offers scalability but is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized environments.

In Summary, Cisco ISE provides a web-based management interface with a focus on user authentication, while Forescout offers a centralized management platform with detailed device visibility and advanced network segmentation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco ISE	Forescout
A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.	It is a platform that provides continuous security monitoring and mitigation. It allows IT organizations to efficiently address numerous access, endpoint compliance and threat management challenges even within today's complex, dynamic and expansive enterprise networks.
Gain visibility with context and control; Extend zero trust to contain threats; Accelerate value of existing solutions; Take the next step in secure access	Device visibility; Continuous compliance enforcement; Design & Deploy Network Segmentation; Orchestrate Infrastructure-Wide Security
Statistics
Stacks 19	Stacks 3
Followers 26	Followers 17
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Cisco ISE, Forescout?

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Related Comparisons

Cisco ISE vs Forescout: What are the differences?

Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout are both network access control solutions, but they have some key differences.

Management Interface: Cisco ISE provides a web-based management interface that allows administrators to configure policies, manage users, and monitor network activity. On the other hand, Forescout offers a centralized management platform that provides visibility and control over connected devices, regardless of their location.
Endpoint Visibility: While both solutions offer endpoint visibility, Forescout provides more granular information about connected devices. It can identify and classify devices based on their type, model, operating system, and more. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, focuses more on user authentication and authorization rather than detailed device visibility.
Integration Capabilities: Cisco ISE has extensive integration capabilities with other Cisco products like Cisco Identity Services Engine Integration, which allows for seamless integration with Cisco switches, routers, and firewalls. Forescout also offers integration with a wide range of third-party security and IT management tools.
Network Segmentation: Cisco ISE provides built-in network segmentation capabilities, allowing administrators to define and enforce security policies based on user roles, device type, and other factors. Forescout, on the other hand, offers more advanced network segmentation options, including the ability to dynamically create and enforce micro-segmentation policies based on real-time network conditions.
Threat Intelligence: Forescout incorporates threat intelligence feeds into its solution, allowing administrators to proactively identify and respond to security threats. It can detect and block known malicious activities based on real-time threat intelligence. Cisco ISE, on the other hand, relies more on its integration with other security tools, such as Cisco's Firepower Management Center, to detect and respond to threats.
Scalability: Cisco ISE is known for its scalability, capable of supporting large-scale deployments with thousands of users and devices. Forescout also offers scalability but is more suitable for smaller to mid-sized environments.

Cisco ISE vs Forescout

Overview