Clojure vs Om: What are the differences?
Developers describe Clojure as "A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine". Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system. On the other hand, Om is detailed as "ClojureScript interface to Facebook's React". A ClojureScript UI framework and client/server architecture over Facebook's React. Om UIs are out of the box snapshotable and undoable and these operations have no implementation complexity and little overhead.
Clojure and Om can be categorized as "Languages" tools.
Clojure and Om are both open source tools. It seems that Clojure with 7.85K GitHub stars and 1.25K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Om with 6.61K GitHub stars and 371 GitHub forks.
CircleCI, Groupon, and Soundcloud are some of the popular companies that use Clojure, whereas Om is used by Precursor, NAVIS, and Montoux. Clojure has a broader approval, being mentioned in 95 company stacks & 80 developers stacks; compared to Om, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.