StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Clojure vs TypeScript

Clojure vs TypeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Clojure
Clojure
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.4K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars10.7K
Forks1.5K
TypeScript
TypeScript
Stacks105.1K
Followers74.2K
Votes503
GitHub Stars106.6K
Forks13.1K

Clojure vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Clojure and TypeScript are both programming languages used for different purposes. Clojure is a dynamic language that runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and is based on Lisp, while TypeScript is a statically typed language that compiles to JavaScript. Although both languages are used in web development, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Syntax and Paradigm: Clojure is a functional programming language that follows a Lisp-like syntax, whereas TypeScript is an object-oriented programming language that follows a C-style syntax. This difference in syntax and programming paradigm affects how code is written and organized in both languages.

  2. Type System: TypeScript is a statically typed language, which means variables have definite types that are checked at compile-time. On the other hand, Clojure is dynamically typed, allowing variables to take on any type and type checking to be done at runtime. This difference impacts how errors are caught and how code is structured in the two languages.

  3. Concurrency: Clojure has built-in support for concurrency with its immutable data structures and programming primitives like atoms, agents, and refs. This makes it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs in Clojure. In contrast, TypeScript does not have built-in concurrency constructs but can utilize JavaScript libraries and frameworks for concurrent programming.

  4. Tooling and Ecosystem: TypeScript has a mature tooling ecosystem with support for code editors, linting, debugging, and testing tools. It also has a large and active community with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available. Clojure, while also having tooling support, may not have as many options as TypeScript due to its comparatively smaller community.

  5. Integration with Existing Codebases: TypeScript is designed to be a superset of JavaScript, which means it can seamlessly integrate with existing JavaScript codebases. This allows developers to incrementally introduce TypeScript into their projects without having to rewrite everything. In contrast, while Clojure can interoperate with Java code, it may require more effort and configuration to integrate with existing codebases.

  6. Performance: Clojure is known for its focus on performance and has several features that contribute to its speed, such as its immutable data structures and support for concurrency. TypeScript, being a language that compiles to JavaScript, may not have the same level of performance optimization and may need additional optimization techniques for performance-critical applications.

In summary, Clojure and TypeScript differ in terms of syntax and paradigm, type system, concurrency support, tooling ecosystem, integration with existing codebases, and performance. Depending on the requirements of a project, one language may be more suitable than the other.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Clojure, TypeScript

Jarvis
Jarvis

May 16, 2019

ReviewonTypeScriptTypeScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k
Comments
David
David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

ReviewonJavaScriptJavaScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)TypeScriptTypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Aug 13, 2019

Needs adviceonTypeScriptTypeScriptCoffeeScriptCoffeeScriptJavaScriptJavaScript

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

405k views405k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Clojure
Clojure
TypeScript
TypeScript

Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.7K
GitHub Stars
106.6K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
13.1K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
105.1K
Followers
1.4K
Followers
74.2K
Votes
1.1K
Votes
503
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 118
    It is a lisp
  • 101
    Concise syntax
  • 100
    Persistent data structures
  • 90
    jvm-based language
  • 89
    Concurrency
Cons
  • 11
    Cryptic stacktraces
  • 5
    Need to wrap basically every java lib
  • 4
    Toxic community
  • 3
    Slow application startup
  • 3
    Tonns of abandonware
Pros
  • 173
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 105
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
Cons
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Clojure, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase