CloudMapper vs Hava: What are the differences?

# Introduction

CloudMapper and Hava are both cloud infrastructure visualization tools, but they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Data Sources**: CloudMapper gathers data by querying AWS APIs directly, providing real-time information on the status of resources and their relationships. In contrast, Hava imports data from AWS Config snapshots, offering a historical view of the infrastructure at specific points in time.
   
2. **Visualization Style**: CloudMapper uses graph-based visualizations to represent infrastructure components and their relationships, making it easy to understand complex environments at a glance. On the other hand, Hava uses interactive 3D models to showcase the infrastructure, allowing users to navigate and explore their resources in a more immersive way.
   
3. **Focus on Security**: CloudMapper has a strong focus on security analysis, allowing users to identify potential security risks and vulnerabilities in their AWS accounts. Hava, on the other hand, emphasizes infrastructure optimization and cost analysis, helping users to optimize their resource usage and reduce unnecessary expenses.
   
4. **Integration Capabilities**: CloudMapper offers integrations with third-party security tools, such as Security Monkey and Scout2, to provide a comprehensive security analysis for AWS environments. In contrast, Hava integrates with DevOps tools like Terraform and Ansible, enabling users to automate infrastructure provisioning and management processes.
   
5. **User Interface**: CloudMapper has a command-line interface (CLI) that caters to advanced users who prefer working with scripts and configurations. In contrast, Hava offers a user-friendly web interface with interactive features that appeal to a wider range of users, including non-technical stakeholders.
   
6. **Cost Structure**: CloudMapper is an open-source tool with no upfront costs, making it ideal for small businesses and individual users with budget constraints. Conversely, Hava follows a subscription-based pricing model, which may be more suitable for larger enterprises with specific requirements and support needs.

In Summary, CloudMapper and Hava differ in their data sources, visualization style, security focus, integration capabilities, user interface, and cost structure, catering to different user preferences and requirements in managing cloud infrastructure.