StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Cmder vs Hyper Terminal

Cmder vs Hyper Terminal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cmder
Cmder
Stacks45
Followers50
Votes0
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks2.1K
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal
Stacks105
Followers165
Votes0

Cmder vs Hyper Terminal: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Cmder and Hyper Terminal.

  1. Customization Options: Cmder offers more extensive customization options compared to Hyper Terminal. With Cmder, users can easily change the color scheme, modify the prompt, and add aliases for frequently used commands. On the other hand, Hyper Terminal has limited customization options, allowing users to only change the basic styling elements such as colors and fonts.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Cmder is a Windows-specific terminal emulator, whereas Hyper Terminal is platform-independent and can be used on Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes Hyper Terminal a more versatile option for developers working on different operating systems.

  3. Shell Integration: Cmder comes with pre-configured integration for popular shell environments such as Git Bash and PowerShell. Thus, users can seamlessly switch between different shells without any additional setup. In contrast, Hyper Terminal does not have built-in shell integration, requiring users to manually configure and set up their preferred shell environment.

  4. Plugin Support: Cmder supports a wide range of plugins, allowing users to extend its functionality and add features like syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and Git integration. Hyper Terminal also supports plugins, but the available options are relatively limited compared to Cmder.

  5. Performance: Cmder is known for its fast and responsive performance, even when dealing with resource-intensive tasks. Hyper Terminal, while generally efficient, might experience slight lag or slowdowns when running more demanding commands or processes.

  6. Community and Documentation: Cmder has a large and active user community, with plenty of online documentation, tutorials, and support available. Hyper Terminal, being a relatively newer project, might have a smaller community and documentation resources in comparison.

In summary, Cmder offers more customization options, has better shell integration, superior plugin support, and a larger community compared to Hyper Terminal. However, Hyper Terminal is platform-independent and can be used across different operating systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cmder
Cmder
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Total portability; Keyboard shortcuts
Extensions; Keymaps; Configuration; Cross Platform; Open source; Themes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45
Stacks
105
Followers
50
Followers
165
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to Cmder, Hyper Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

SecureCRT

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope