StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. COBOL vs OCaml

COBOL vs OCaml

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

COBOL
COBOL
Stacks130
Followers147
Votes2
OCaml
OCaml
Stacks321
Followers186
Votes28

COBOL vs OCaml: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between COBOL and OCaml

In the world of programming languages, COBOL and OCaml stand out as unique options with distinct features and attributes. Let's explore the key differences between these two languages.

1. **Paradigm**:
COBOL, which stands for Common Business-Oriented Language, is primarily used in business, finance, and administrative systems and follows a procedural programming paradigm. On the other hand, OCaml, short for Objective Caml, is a functional programming language that supports both imperative and object-oriented paradigms, making it versatile in handling various programming styles.

2. **Typing System**:
One significant difference between COBOL and OCaml is their typing systems. COBOL employs static typing, where data types are explicitly declared at compile time and remain fixed throughout the program. Conversely, OCaml features a powerful type inference system that automatically deduces the types of variables, providing flexibility while ensuring type safety.

3. **Syntax**:
When it comes to syntax, COBOL is known for its verbose and English-like syntax, making it easy to understand for non-programmers or those with a background in business operations. In contrast, OCaml has a more concise and expressive syntax, with a strong emphasis on patterns and type declarations that are common in functional programming languages.

4. **Memory Management**:
In terms of memory management, COBOL relies on manual memory allocation and deallocation by the programmer, which can lead to challenges such as memory leaks and pointer errors if not handled properly. On the other hand, OCaml features automatic memory management through garbage collection, reducing the burden on the developer and improving the overall reliability of the code.

5. **Ecosystem**:
Another key difference lies in the ecosystems surrounding COBOL and OCaml. COBOL is predominantly used in legacy systems and enterprise applications, often requiring specialized knowledge and maintenance. In contrast, OCaml is popular in academia, research, and the development of high-performance applications, with a strong community that supports libraries, tools, and frameworks for various problem domains.

6. **Platform Compatibility**:
COBOL is traditionally associated with mainframe systems and has strong compatibility with such environments, offering robust support for legacy hardware and software configurations. In contrast, OCaml is known for its portability across different platforms, enabling developers to write code that can be easily deployed on various operating systems and architectures without major modifications.

In Summary, COBOL and OCaml diverge in paradigms, typing systems, syntax, memory management, ecosystems, and platform compatibility, showcasing their unique strengths and characteristics in the realm of programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

COBOL
COBOL
OCaml
OCaml

COBOL was one of the first programming languages to be standardised: the first COBOL standard was issued by ANSI in 1968. COBOL is primarily used in business, finance, and administrative systems for companies and governments.

It is an industrial strength programming language supporting functional, imperative and object-oriented styles. It is the technology of choice in companies where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters,

-
functional style; imperative style; object-oriented style
Statistics
Stacks
130
Stacks
321
Followers
147
Followers
186
Votes
2
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Business Oriented Language
Cons
  • 2
    Extremely long code for simple functions
Pros
  • 7
    Satisfying to write
  • 6
    Pattern matching
  • 4
    Also has OOP
  • 4
    Very practical
  • 3
    Easy syntax
Cons
  • 3
    Small community
  • 1
    Royal pain in the neck to compile large programs
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to COBOL, OCaml?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase