StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Cloud Content Management System
  5. Cockpit vs Webmin

Cockpit vs Webmin

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cockpit
Cockpit
Stacks57
Followers237
Votes20
Webmin
Webmin
Stacks72
Followers163
Votes13
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks727

Cockpit vs Webmin: What are the differences?

Cockpit and Webmin are two popular web-based server administration tools that provide user-friendly interfaces for managing Linux servers. While both tools have similar goals, there are key differences between them that make each tool unique.

  1. User Interface: Cockpit focuses on providing a modern and intuitive interface, with a user-friendly design and easy navigation. It offers a responsive web interface that adapts well to different screen sizes and devices. On the other hand, Webmin has a more traditional interface with a hierarchical menu system and a wide range of configuration options.

  2. Features: Cockpit is designed to provide a streamlined set of features for managing the server, with a focus on system monitoring, user management, and network configuration. It offers a dashboard that provides an overview of the server's status and allows quick access to common tasks. Webmin, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of features covering various aspects of server administration, including file management, software package management, and DNS configuration.

  3. Integration: Cockpit is tightly integrated with the underlying Linux system, making use of systemd for managing services and the PolicyKit framework for authentication and access control. This integration enables Cockpit to provide a consistent and secure administration experience. Webmin, on the other hand, is built as a standalone application and can be installed on a wide range of Linux distributions without any specific dependencies.

  4. Extensibility: Cockpit offers a modular architecture that allows developers to create custom plugins and extensions to add new functionality. It supports the use of Cockpit Bridge, which enables integration with existing server administration tools and scripts. Webmin also provides a plugin system for extending its functionality, with a wide range of third-party modules available for various services and applications.

  5. Target Audience: Cockpit is aimed at system administrators who prefer a simplified and modern interface, with a focus on managing a single server or a small number of servers. It is suitable for both beginners and experienced administrators who value simplicity and ease of use. Webmin, on the other hand, is designed for more experienced administrators who require advanced configuration options and need to manage multiple servers from a centralized interface.

  6. Licensing: Cockpit is released under the LGPL (Lesser General Public License) and is open source, allowing users to inspect and modify the source code. Webmin is released under the BSD license and is also open source.

In summary, Cockpit and Webmin differ in their user interface, features, integration with the Linux system, extensibility, target audience, and licensing. Both tools offer valuable server administration capabilities, but the choice between them depends on individual preferences and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cockpit
Cockpit
Webmin
Webmin

An API-driven CMS without forcing you to make compromises in how you implement your site. The CMS for developers. Manage content like collections, regions, forms and galleries which you can reuse anywhere on your website.

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Self hosted;Crazy fast & lightweight; Flexible; Expandable;Modern & Simple Interface
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
727
Stacks
57
Stacks
72
Followers
237
Followers
163
Votes
20
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Modular
  • 3
    Easy for Content Managers to understand and use
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 3
    Self hosted
  • 3
    Flexible and plays nicely with any frontend
Pros
  • 3
    Review real-time resources (cpu, mem, stg, proc)
  • 2
    Virtualmin
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Free
  • 1
    Modify applications
Integrations
No integrations available
MySQL
MySQL
Fedora
Fedora
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Cockpit, Webmin?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Sanity

Sanity

Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

Contentful

Contentful

With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana