Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs UIkIt: What are the differences?
Cocoa Touch (iOS): The Cocoa Touch collection of frameworks includes everything needed to create iOS apps. The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services; UIkIt: A lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces. UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.
Cocoa Touch (iOS) belongs to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack, while UIkIt can be primarily classified under "Front-End Frameworks".
"Backed by Apple" is the top reason why over 5 developers like Cocoa Touch (iOS), while over 25 developers mention "Complete GUI" as the leading cause for choosing UIkIt.
UIkIt is an open source tool with 14.6K GitHub stars and 2.1K GitHub forks. Here's a link to UIkIt's open source repository on GitHub.
According to the StackShare community, UIkIt has a broader approval, being mentioned in 45 company stacks & 9 developers stacks; compared to Cocoa Touch (iOS), which is listed in 32 company stacks and 18 developer stacks.
What is Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
What is UIkIt?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
What are the cons of using UIkIt?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with UIkIt?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
When we first built the ArifZefen app our focus was around validating our business assumptions and finding a good product fit. Once we got to a few thousand users, it became clear that we needed to make quality a priority and that meant we needed a reliable tool that will allow us to monitor the health of our app. Crashlytics (now Fabric by Twitter ) was on a short list of solutions we closely explored and we were very happy with its ease of integration and the consistency it brought to our Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Android SDK crash monitoring.
Its daily pulse emails were also super informative in giving us a good sense of how each platform was doing in terms of crash-free and new users, daily actives and other relevant session data. These emails also surfaced any anomalies in daily trends, alerting us of any reason for concern. Overall, Crashlytics was instrumental in allowing us to quickly discover and diagnose crashes and it is one of the main reasons we were able to keep our app store ratings reasonable high. But perhaps even more importantly, we were able to set a high quality bar for our users that absent Crashlytics would have been difficult to maintain.
Provides common user interface like dialogs, menus, etc. Is modular and hight customisable. A part from the grid system, is not used directly, but has as layer of abstraction build with web components, and typescript as far as possible with the time and working constraints, to be reused in other projects.