StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Cocoa (OS X) vs SwiftUI

Cocoa (OS X) vs SwiftUI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)
Stacks39
Followers52
Votes6
SwiftUI
SwiftUI
Stacks590
Followers567
Votes6

Cocoa (OS X) vs SwiftUI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cocoa and SwiftUI are both frameworks used for developing applications on Apple platforms, but they have several key differences.

  1. Design Philosophy: Cocoa follows an imperative programming paradigm, where developers have more control over the UI elements and their behaviors. They utilize Interface Builder and write code in Objective-C or Swift. On the other hand, SwiftUI follows a declarative programming paradigm, where developers define the desired state of the UI and let the framework take care of the updates. The UI is written in Swift code using a declarative syntax.

  2. User Interface: Cocoa uses AppKit for macOS applications and UIKit for iOS applications. It provides a rich set of UI components that have been refined over the years. On the other hand, SwiftUI introduces a new set of UI components specifically designed for modern Apple platforms. These components are scalable and adaptive, providing a consistent look and feel across different devices.

  3. Live Preview: SwiftUI offers a live preview feature that allows developers to see the changes they make to the UI in real-time. This significantly speeds up the development process and provides instant feedback. Cocoa, in contrast, does not have a built-in live preview feature, requiring developers to build and run the application to see the changes.

  4. Cross-platform Compatibility: While Cocoa is primarily used for macOS and iOS development, SwiftUI is designed to be cross-platform. With SwiftUI, developers can write a single codebase that can be used to create applications for macOS, iOS, watchOS, and tvOS. This significantly reduces development time and effort.

  5. Deployment Target: By using Cocoa, developers can target older versions of macOS and iOS, allowing their applications to run on a wide range of devices. SwiftUI, however, is only available on macOS 10.15 or later and iOS 13 or later. This limitation may require developers to drop support for older devices or use alternative frameworks for backward compatibility.

  6. Learning Curve: Cocoa has been around for a long time and has a vast ecosystem of libraries, resources, and documentation available. Developers familiar with Cocoa can leverage their existing knowledge and experience to build applications. On the other hand, SwiftUI is relatively new and has a learning curve for developers who are used to working with Cocoa. However, SwiftUI's declarative syntax and simplified UI development approach can lead to faster development once the learning curve is overcame.

In Summary, Cocoa and SwiftUI differ in their design philosophy, user interface components, live preview capability, cross-platform compatibility, deployment target, and learning curve. While Cocoa offers more control and wider device compatibility, SwiftUI provides a modern and scalable UI development approach with a live preview feature and cross-platform support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cocoa (OS X)
Cocoa (OS X)
SwiftUI
SwiftUI

Much of Cocoa is implemented in Objective-C, an object-oriented language that is compiled to run at incredible speed, yet employs a truly dynamic runtime making it uniquely flexible. Because Objective-C is a superset of C, it is easy to mix C and even C++ into your Cocoa applications.

Provides views, controls, and layout structures for declaring your app's user interface. The framework provides event handlers for delivering taps, gestures, and other types of input to your app.

-
Declarative Syntax; Design Tools; Drag and drop; Dynamic replacement; Previews; Native on All Apple Platforms; Generate dynamic, interactive previews of your custom views; Define interactions from taps, clicks, and swipes to fine-grained gestures; Control and respond to the flow of data and changes within your app’s models; Integrate SwiftUI views into existing apps, and embed AppKit, UIKit, and WatchKit views and controllers into SwiftUI view hierarchies; Present your content onscreen and handle user interactions
Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
590
Followers
52
Followers
567
Votes
6
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    IOS
  • 1
    Backed by apple
Pros
  • 2
    XCode Canvas feature
  • 2
    Live previews
  • 2
    Smaller Scalable views
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
macOS
macOS
Swift
Swift
Xcode
Xcode

What are some alternatives to Cocoa (OS X), SwiftUI?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase