Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Codeception

140
110
+ 1
4
Selenium

15.4K
12.3K
+ 1
525
Add tool

Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Codeception vs Selenium

Codeception and Selenium are both popular automation testing tools used for web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Programming Language Support: Codeception supports multiple programming languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, allowing developers to use their preferred language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, although it does have limited support for other languages through third-party extensions.

  2. Test Execution Speed: Codeception generally executes tests faster compared to Selenium. This is because Codeception utilizes the WebDriver protocol which offers faster and more efficient interactions between the tests and the browser. Selenium, on the other hand, has a relatively slower test execution speed due to its architecture and dependencies.

  3. Built-in Test Framework: Codeception comes with a built-in test framework that provides various testing utilities and features out of the box. Selenium, on the other hand, is more of a standalone tool and requires the use of additional frameworks like TestNG or JUnit for organizing and executing tests effectively.

  4. Browser Support: Codeception supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, by leveraging Selenium WebDriver. Selenium itself supports all major browsers but requires the additional setup of browser-specific drivers to interact with them.

  5. Ease of Use: Codeception has a simplified and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to get started with test automation. It provides high-level methods and clear test scenarios, allowing for easier test creation and maintenance. Selenium, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Java or object-oriented programming.

  6. Parallel Execution: Codeception provides easy parallel test execution, allowing multiple tests to be run concurrently. This feature enables faster test execution and improved efficiency when running tests in parallel. Selenium, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel test execution.

In Summary, Codeception provides support for multiple programming languages, offers faster test execution speed, has a built-in test framework, supports a wide range of browsers, has an easier learning curve, and provides parallel test execution out of the box, setting it apart from Selenium.

Advice on Codeception and Selenium
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 214.9K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Codeception
Pros of Selenium
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests
  • 175
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Codeception
Cons of Selenium
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 8
      Flaky tests
    • 4
      Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
    • 2
      Update browser drivers

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Codeception?

    Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

    What is Selenium?

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Codeception?
    What companies use Selenium?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Codeception or Selenium.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Codeception?
    What tools integrate with Selenium?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Codeception and Selenium?
    PHPUnit
    PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
    Behat
    It is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation.
    CodeceptJS
    It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.
    Cypress
    Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
    Cucumber
    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
    See all alternatives