Codeception vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Codeception

Stacks155

Followers111

Votes5

Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Codeception vs Selenium

Codeception and Selenium are both popular automation testing tools used for web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

Programming Language Support: Codeception supports multiple programming languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, allowing developers to use their preferred language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, although it does have limited support for other languages through third-party extensions.
Test Execution Speed: Codeception generally executes tests faster compared to Selenium. This is because Codeception utilizes the WebDriver protocol which offers faster and more efficient interactions between the tests and the browser. Selenium, on the other hand, has a relatively slower test execution speed due to its architecture and dependencies.
Built-in Test Framework: Codeception comes with a built-in test framework that provides various testing utilities and features out of the box. Selenium, on the other hand, is more of a standalone tool and requires the use of additional frameworks like TestNG or JUnit for organizing and executing tests effectively.
Browser Support: Codeception supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, by leveraging Selenium WebDriver. Selenium itself supports all major browsers but requires the additional setup of browser-specific drivers to interact with them.
Ease of Use: Codeception has a simplified and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to get started with test automation. It provides high-level methods and clear test scenarios, allowing for easier test creation and maintenance. Selenium, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Java or object-oriented programming.
Parallel Execution: Codeception provides easy parallel test execution, allowing multiple tests to be run concurrently. This feature enables faster test execution and improved efficiency when running tests in parallel. Selenium, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel test execution.

In Summary, Codeception provides support for multiple programming languages, offers faster test execution speed, has a built-in test framework, supports a wide range of browsers, has an easier learning curve, and provides parallel test execution out of the box, setting it apart from Selenium.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, Codeception

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Codeception
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 155
Followers 12.6K	Followers 111
Votes 527	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Pros 4 Easy to get up and running some simple tests

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Codeception?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Codeception vs Selenium

Codeception and Selenium are both popular automation testing tools used for web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

Programming Language Support: Codeception supports multiple programming languages such as PHP, Python, and Ruby, allowing developers to use their preferred language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, although it does have limited support for other languages through third-party extensions.
Test Execution Speed: Codeception generally executes tests faster compared to Selenium. This is because Codeception utilizes the WebDriver protocol which offers faster and more efficient interactions between the tests and the browser. Selenium, on the other hand, has a relatively slower test execution speed due to its architecture and dependencies.
Built-in Test Framework: Codeception comes with a built-in test framework that provides various testing utilities and features out of the box. Selenium, on the other hand, is more of a standalone tool and requires the use of additional frameworks like TestNG or JUnit for organizing and executing tests effectively.
Browser Support: Codeception supports a wide range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, by leveraging Selenium WebDriver. Selenium itself supports all major browsers but requires the additional setup of browser-specific drivers to interact with them.
Ease of Use: Codeception has a simplified and intuitive syntax, making it easier for beginners to get started with test automation. It provides high-level methods and clear test scenarios, allowing for easier test creation and maintenance. Selenium, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Java or object-oriented programming.
Parallel Execution: Codeception provides easy parallel test execution, allowing multiple tests to be run concurrently. This feature enables faster test execution and improved efficiency when running tests in parallel. Selenium, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel test execution.

Codeception vs Selenium

Overview

Codeception vs Selenium: What are the differences?