StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Coverage
  4. Code Coverage
  5. Codecov vs Istanbul

Codecov vs Istanbul

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Istanbul
Istanbul
Stacks785
Followers8
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks780
Codecov
Codecov
Stacks2.8K
Followers324
Votes102

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Istanbul
Istanbul
Codecov
Codecov

It is a JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

All-javascript instrumentation library that tracks statement, branch, and function coverage; Module loader hooks to instrument code on the fly; Command line tools to run node unit tests "with coverage turned on" and no cooperation whatsoever from the test runner; Multiple report formats: HTML, LCOV, Cobertura and more; Ability to use as middleware when serving JS files that need to be tested on the browser; Can be used on the command line as well as a library; Based on the awesome esprima parser and the equally awesome escodegen code generator; Well-tested on node (prev, current and next versions) and the browser (instrumentation library only)
Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
780
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
785
Stacks
2.8K
Followers
8
Followers
324
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
Cons
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
HipChat
HipChat
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Heroku
Heroku

What are some alternatives to Istanbul, Codecov?

Coveralls

Coveralls

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

uberalls

uberalls

Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana