StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CodeIgniter vs FullStack Boilerplate

CodeIgniter vs FullStack Boilerplate

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Stacks3.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes466
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate
Stacks7
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

CodeIgniter vs FullStack Boilerplate: What are the differences?

1. **Architecture Approach**: CodeIgniter is a traditional MVC framework that follows a more structured approach to development, while FullStack Boilerplate is a more flexible boilerplate that allows for different architectural patterns like MVC, MVVM, MVP, etc. 2. **Built-in Modules**: CodeIgniter provides some built-in libraries and modules for common tasks like form validation, database management, etc., whereas FullStack Boilerplate provides a minimalist setup with no built-in modules, allowing developers to choose and integrate their preferred libraries and modules. 3. **File Organization**: CodeIgniter has a predefined file structure for organizing code, configurations, views, controllers, etc., making it easier for developers to navigate and understand the project, whereas FullStack Boilerplate offers a more open-ended file organization, promoting a higher degree of customization but potentially leading to inconsistency. 4. **Community Support**: CodeIgniter has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of developers, providing more readily available resources, documentation, and community support compared to FullStack Boilerplate, which might have a smaller user base and fewer resources. 5. **Deployment and Scalability**: CodeIgniter is known for its ease of deployment and scalability, making it suitable for projects of various sizes, while FullStack Boilerplate may require more customization and configuration for deployment and might be more suitable for smaller or medium-sized projects. 6. **Learning Curve**: CodeIgniter is generally considered more beginner-friendly due to its simplicity and convention over configuration approach, making it easier for new developers to get started, while FullStack Boilerplate, with its flexibility and customizable nature, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners needing to make design decisions.

In Summary, the key differences between CodeIgniter and FullStack Boilerplate lie in their architecture approach, built-in modules, file organization, community support, deployment and scalability, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CodeIgniter, FullStack Boilerplate

Ajeet
Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate

CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
3.2K
Stacks
7
Followers
1.5K
Followers
30
Votes
466
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
Cons
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
TypeScript
TypeScript
Apollo
Apollo
React Native
React Native
GraphQL
GraphQL
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase