StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. Compass vs Protractor

Compass vs Protractor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Compass
Compass
Stacks352
Followers297
Votes12
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks1.2K
Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers543
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K

Compass vs Protractor: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax: One key difference between Compass and Protractor is the syntax they use to write test scripts. Compass uses SCSS syntax, while Protractor utilizes JavaScript to write test scripts.
  2. Compatibility: Compass is primarily used for styling and compiling Sass files, whereas Protractor is specifically designed for end-to-end testing of AngularJS applications.
  3. Framework: Compass is a CSS authoring framework, providing a set of useful tools and functions for styling, whereas Protractor is a testing framework specifically built for AngularJS applications, making it easier to write and execute tests for AngularJS applications.
  4. Execution Environment: Compass runs on the Ruby platform, whereas Protractor relies on Node.js for its execution environment.
  5. Purpose: The main purpose of Compass is to make CSS authoring easier and more efficient, while Protractor is focused on automating testing processes for AngularJS applications.
  6. Community Support: Protractor has a larger and more active community compared to Compass, providing better resources and support for its users.

In Summary, Compass and Protractor differ in syntax, compatibility, framework, execution environment, purpose, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Compass, Protractor

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Compass
Compass
Protractor
Protractor

The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

-
Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
352
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
297
Followers
543
Votes
12
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    No vendor prefix CSS pain
  • 1
    Compass sprites
  • 1
    Mixins
  • 1
    Variables
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Promise support
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
Integrations
Sass
Sass
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Compass, Protractor?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Stylus

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

PostCSS

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot