StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Conan vs npm

Conan vs npm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

npm
npm
Stacks137.4K
Followers82.2K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks3.0K
Conan
Conan
Stacks84
Followers108
Votes10
GitHub Stars9.0K
Forks1.1K

Conan vs npm: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Conan and npm are both widely used package managers in the software development community. While they serve a similar purpose of managing dependencies for projects, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Package Manager Types: Conan is a package manager primarily used for C and C++ projects, focusing on binary package management and supporting multiple package and build configurations. On the other hand, npm is mainly used for JavaScript projects and focuses on managing and distributing Node.js packages, including both frontend and backend dependencies.

  2. Language Compatibility: Conan supports different programming languages such as C++, C#, Python, and others, making it a versatile choice for cross-language projects. In contrast, npm is optimized for JavaScript applications, and it may not be as suitable for projects written in other languages.

  3. Package Distribution: Conan allows for the distribution of binary packages, which can greatly reduce the time spent on building dependencies. In contrast, npm primarily uses source code distribution, requiring the installation and building of dependencies on the target system.

  4. Package Versioning: Conan provides fine-grained versioning control, allowing users to specify exact package versions, dependencies, and package variations for different platforms and configurations. npm, on the other hand, uses semantic versioning, which provides a more flexible approach for specifying package dependencies.

  5. Registry and Ecosystem: Conan relies on a decentralized model and can work with different package repositories. It provides support for both public and private package repositories, allowing for more flexibility and customization. npm, on the other hand, has a centralized registry, which may result in a more straightforward and unified experience for package discovery and distribution.

  6. Integration with Build Systems: Conan is designed to integrate well with CMake, a popular build system for C and C++ projects, allowing for seamless integration into existing workflows. npm, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with the Node.js ecosystem and works well with other JavaScript build tools such as Webpack and Babel.

In summary, Conan and npm are both powerful package managers but cater to different programming languages and have distinct features such as package distribution methods, versioning approaches, registry models, and build system integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on npm, Conan

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
Mark
Mark

CTO at Gemsotec bvba

Apr 25, 2019

ReviewonReactReactTypeScriptTypeScriptYarnYarn

I use npm because I also mainly use React and TypeScript. Since several typings (from DefinitelyTyped) depend on the React typings, Yarn tends to mess up which leads to duplicate libraries present (different versions of the same type definition), which hinders the Typescript compiler. Npm always resolves to a single version per transitive dependency. At least that's my experience with both.

251k views251k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

npm
npm
Conan
Conan

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Install or build your own packages for any platform. Conan also allows you to run your own server easily from the command line.

-
Dependencies and package management for developers; De-centralized; Source code and binaries; Full open-source stack; Simple, flexible and powerful scripting; Full control of dependencies; Free hosting service for free software;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
9.0K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
137.4K
Stacks
84
Followers
82.2K
Followers
108
Votes
1.6K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 648
    Best package management system for javascript
  • 382
    Open-source
  • 327
    Great community
  • 148
    More packages than rubygems, pypi, or packagist
  • 112
    Nice people matter
Cons
  • 5
    Bad at package versioning and being deterministic
  • 5
    Problems with lockfiles
  • 3
    Node-gyp takes forever
  • 1
    Super slow
Pros
  • 4
    Crossplatform builds
  • 3
    Easy to maintain used dependencies
  • 2
    Build recipes can be very flexble
  • 1
    Integrations with cmake, qmake and other build systems
Cons
  • 1
    3rd party recipes can be flawed
Integrations
No integrations available
C lang
C lang
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to npm, Conan?

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Gemfury

Gemfury

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Duo

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana