StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Conductor vs Express Gateway

Conductor vs Express Gateway

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Conductor
Conductor
Stacks66
Followers122
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.8K
Forks2.3K
Express Gateway
Express Gateway
Stacks62
Followers167
Votes10

Conductor vs Express Gateway: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Key differences between Conductor and Express Gateway are outlined below.

1. **Architecture**: Conductor follows a microservices architecture, allowing for scalability and flexibility in managing multiple services, while Express Gateway is built on Node.js and Express.js, providing a lightweight and adaptable gateway for managing APIs.
2. **Scalability**: Conductor offers horizontal scalability by enabling the distribution of services across multiple nodes, while Express Gateway scales vertically through a single node setup with the option to add more instances.
3. **Configuration**: Conductor uses a declarative JSON format for configuration, making it easy to define workflows and dependencies, whereas Express Gateway utilizes a plugin-based system for configuration, providing more flexibility in customizing the gateway functionalities.
4. **Plugins**: Conductor has a limited number of built-in plugins for extending functionality, whereas Express Gateway offers a wide range of community-supported plugins for adding features like authentication, rate limiting, and logging.
5. **Monitoring**: Conductor provides basic monitoring capabilities for tracking service performance and resource usage, while Express Gateway integrates with third-party monitoring tools like Prometheus and Grafana for more advanced monitoring and analytics.
6. **Community Support**: Conductor has a smaller community compared to Express Gateway, resulting in fewer resources and community-driven plugins available for support and troubleshooting.

In Summary, these key differences highlight the architectural, scalability, configuration, plugin, monitoring, and community support disparities between Conductor and Express Gateway.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Conductor
Conductor
Express Gateway
Express Gateway

Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.;A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.;Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.;Expose control semantics around pause, resume, restart, etc allowing for better devops experience.;Allow greater reuse of existing microservices providing an easier path for onboarding.;User interface to visualize the process flows.;Ability to synchronously process all the tasks when needed.;Ability to scale millions of concurrently running process flows.;Backed by a queuing service abstracted from the clients.;Be able to operate on HTTP or other transports e.g. gRPC.
Authentication;Authorization;API Management;Microservices;JSON Web Token (JWT);OAuth2;Custom Plugins;Consumer Mgmt;YAML Driven; REST API;Pipelines;Built-in Policies;Hot Reload and Restart;Actions & Conditions;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
66
Stacks
62
Followers
122
Followers
167
Votes
0
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Microservices, Body manipulation
  • 3
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Amazing api gwy. Easy and powerful configuration
Cons
  • 2
    Deprecated
Integrations
No integrations available
Prometheus
Prometheus
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
StatsD
StatsD
Node.js
Node.js
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

What are some alternatives to Conductor, Express Gateway?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana