StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Conductor vs Kuma

Conductor vs Kuma

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Conductor
Conductor
Stacks66
Followers122
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.8K
Forks2.3K
Kuma
Kuma
Stacks16
Followers95
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks169

Conductor vs Kuma: What are the differences?

What is Conductor? *A microservices orchestration engine that runs in the cloud *. Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.

What is Kuma? Build, Secure and Observe your modern Service Mesh. It is a universal open source control-plane for Service Mesh and Microservices that can run and be operated natively across both Kubernetes and VM environments, in order to be easily adopted by every team in the organization.

Conductor and Kuma can be categorized as "Microservices" tools.

Some of the features offered by Conductor are:

  • Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.
  • A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.
  • Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.

On the other hand, Kuma provides the following key features:

  • Universal Control Plane
  • Lightweight Data Plane
  • Automatic

Conductor and Kuma are both open source tools. Conductor with 2.14K GitHub stars and 643 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Kuma with 789 GitHub stars and 31 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Conductor, Kuma

Mohammed
Mohammed

CTO at Famcare

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

One of our applications is currently migrating to AWS, and we need to make a decision between using AWS API Gateway with AWS App Mesh, or Kong API Gateway with Kuma.

Some people advise us to benefit from AWS managed services, while others raise the vendor lock issue. So, I need your advice on that, and if there is any other important factor rather than vendor locking that I must take into consideration.

38.8k views38.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Conductor
Conductor
Kuma
Kuma

Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.

It is a universal open source control-plane for Service Mesh and Microservices that can run and be operated natively across both Kubernetes and VM environments, in order to be easily adopted by every team in the organization.

Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.;A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.;Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.;Expose control semantics around pause, resume, restart, etc allowing for better devops experience.;Allow greater reuse of existing microservices providing an easier path for onboarding.;User interface to visualize the process flows.;Ability to synchronously process all the tasks when needed.;Ability to scale millions of concurrently running process flows.;Backed by a queuing service abstracted from the clients.;Be able to operate on HTTP or other transports e.g. gRPC.
Universal Control Plane; Lightweight Data Plane; Automatic; Multi-Tenancy; Network Security; Traffic Segmentation: With flexible ACL rules
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.8K
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
169
Stacks
66
Stacks
16
Followers
122
Followers
95
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
YAML
YAML
CentOS
CentOS
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
macOS
macOS
Debian
Debian
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Conductor, Kuma?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana