StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C++ vs Nim

C++ vs Nim

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C++
C++
Stacks18.2K
Followers9.4K
Votes866
Nim
Nim
Stacks210
Followers154
Votes61
GitHub Stars17.5K
Forks1.5K

C++ vs Nim: What are the differences?

Comparison Between C++ and Nim

C++ and Nim are both high-level programming languages that are used to develop various applications. While they have similarities, there are key differences between them.

  1. Memory Management: One significant difference between C++ and Nim is their memory management approach. C++ is a low-level language that requires manual memory management. Developers have to allocate and deallocate memory explicitly using new and delete keywords. On the other hand, Nim has automatic memory management with a garbage collector that handles memory allocation and deallocation, making it easier and safer for developers.

  2. Syntax and Ease of Use: C++ has a more complex syntax compared to Nim. C++ supports object-oriented programming and procedural programming paradigms, leading to a wider range of syntax constructs. Nim, on the other hand, has a more concise and readable syntax inspired by Python, making it easier to write and understand code.

  3. Compile Time: Another notable difference is the compilation time of C++ and Nim programs. C++ programs usually take longer to compile due to its complex language features and the need for manual memory management. Nim, on the other hand, has a more efficient and faster compilation process, thanks to its static type checking and garbage collector.

  4. Concurrency and Parallelism: C++ has built-in support for concurrency through the use of threads and libraries like OpenMP. However, managing concurrency and parallelism in C++ can be challenging and error-prone. In contrast, Nim provides built-in support for asynchronous programming and lightweight threads through its Future and Async macros, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel code.

  5. Cross-platform Development: C++ is widely known for its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to build applications that can run on multiple operating systems. Nim, being a relatively newer language, is also capable of cross-platform development. However, the ecosystem and libraries available for cross-platform development in Nim may be more limited compared to C++.

  6. Interoperability: C++ has excellent interoperability with other programming languages like C, allowing developers to easily integrate existing C code into C++ programs. Nim also has good interoperability with C, making it possible to call C functions and use C libraries. Additionally, Nim can interface with JavaScript and even generate JavaScript code, enabling web development tasks.

In Summary, C++ requires manual memory management and has a more complex syntax, whereas Nim features automatic memory management, concise syntax, faster compilation time, built-in support for concurrency, and good interoperability with other languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C++, Nim

albert
albert

May 5, 2020

Needs advice

I am currently learning Back-End design, and I am confused with the term Back-End API. My question is do I need to have a webserver? That is the Browser send a http request to the Webserver, based on the URL, the Webserver will execute the WEB API and route the request to it and send back the response received from the WEB API to the browser. If so, what are the differences from the WebServer to execute a CGI in the traditional architecture?

If this is not the case, is the WEB API a standalone server/application that can process the HTTP request and send back the response to the browser? Thank you very much for clarifying...

63.7k views63.7k
Comments
Russtopia
Russtopia

Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs

Dec 8, 2019

Decided

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

<pre> $ sloc openssh-portable Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 502 112982 14327 15705 143014 100.0% C 389 105938 13349 14416 133703 93.5% Shell 92 6118 937 1129 8184 5.7% Make 16 468 37 131 636 0.4% AWK 1 363 0 7 370 0.3% C++ 3 79 4 18 101 0.1% Conf 1 16 0 4 20 0.0% $ sloc xs Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 34 3658 1231 655 5544 100.0% Go 19 3230 1199 507 4936 89.0% Markdown 2 181 0 76 257 4.6% Make 7 148 4 50 202 3.6% YAML 1 39 0 5 44 0.8% Text 1 30 0 7 37 0.7% Modula 1 16 0 2 18 0.3% Shell 3 14 28 8 50 0.9% </pre>

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

233k views233k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C++
C++
Nim
Nim

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

It is an efficient, expressive and elegant language which compiles to C/C++/JS and more. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula.

-
Intuitive and clean syntax; Many garbage collector options; JavaScript compilation; Decentralised package management; Helpful tracebacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
17.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
18.2K
Stacks
210
Followers
9.4K
Followers
154
Votes
866
Votes
61
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 205
    Performance
  • 108
    Control over memory allocation
  • 99
    Cross-platform
  • 98
    Fast
  • 85
    Object oriented
Cons
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management
Pros
  • 15
    Expressive like Python
  • 15
    Extremely fast
  • 11
    Very fast compilation
  • 7
    Macros
  • 5
    Cross platform
Cons
  • 4
    Small Community
  • 0
    [object Object]
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
C lang
C lang
Python
Python
Sapper
Sapper
Tokamak
Tokamak
Sonic Server
Sonic Server

What are some alternatives to C++, Nim?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase