C++ vs PureBasic

Overview

C++

Stacks18.2K

Followers9.4K

Votes866

PureBasic

Stacks540

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

C++ vs PureBasic: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Memory Management: In PureBasic, memory management is handled automatically, requiring less hassle for the programmer, whereas in C++, manual memory management is crucial, making it more prone to memory leaks if not handled properly.

2. Object-Oriented Programming: C++ is a fully object-oriented language, allowing the use of classes, objects, and inheritance. On the other hand, PureBasic does not provide built-in support for object-oriented programming, making it less suitable for large-scale projects that heavily rely on OOP concepts.

3. Platform Independence: PureBasic generates platform-specific code, limiting its portability to different operating systems. In contrast, C++ can be compiled to run on various platforms, making it more versatile and adaptable to different environments.

4. Syntax Complexity: C++ has a more complex syntax with features like pointers, templates, and multiple inheritance, which can be challenging for beginners to grasp. PureBasic, on the other hand, has a simpler syntax, making it easier to learn and use for novice programmers.

5. Standard Libraries: C++ has a rich set of standard libraries, providing extensive tools and functionalities for developers. PureBasic, although equipped with many built-in functions, lacks the comprehensive standard library support offered by C++.

6. Performance: C++ is known for its high performance due to its efficient memory management and low-level control. PureBasic, while fast and optimized for certain tasks, may not always match the performance level of C++ in demanding computational scenarios.

In Summary, C++ and PureBasic differ in memory management, object-oriented programming, platform independence, syntax complexity, standard libraries, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on C++, PureBasic

albert

May 5, 2020

Needs advice

I am currently learning Back-End design, and I am confused with the term Back-End API. My question is do I need to have a webserver? That is the Browser send a http request to the Webserver, based on the URL, the Webserver will execute the WEB API and route the request to it and send back the response received from the WEB API to the browser. If so, what are the differences from the WebServer to execute a CGI in the traditional architecture?

If this is not the case, is the WEB API a standalone server/application that can process the HTTP request and send back the response to the browser? Thank you very much for clarifying...

63.7k views63.7k

Comments

Russtopia

Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs

Dec 8, 2019

Decided

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

<pre> $ sloc openssh-portable Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 502 112982 14327 15705 143014 100.0% C 389 105938 13349 14416 133703 93.5% Shell 92 6118 937 1129 8184 5.7% Make 16 468 37 131 636 0.4% AWK 1 363 0 7 370 0.3% C++ 3 79 4 18 101 0.1% Conf 1 16 0 4 20 0.0% $ sloc xs Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 34 3658 1231 655 5544 100.0% Go 19 3230 1199 507 4936 89.0% Markdown 2 181 0 76 257 4.6% Make 7 148 4 50 202 3.6% YAML 1 39 0 5 44 0.8% Text 1 30 0 7 37 0.7% Modula 1 16 0 2 18 0.3% Shell 3 14 28 8 50 0.9% </pre>

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

233k views233k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

C++	PureBasic
C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.	It is a commercially distributed procedural computer programming language and integrated development environment based on BASIC and developed by Fantaisie Software for Windows 32/64-bit, Linux 32/64-bit, and macOS.
-	Huge set of internal commands (1600+) to quickly and easily build applications or games; Windows (x86 - x64), Linux (x86 - x64) and OS X (x86 - x64) support; BASIC programming language based keywords; Very fast BASIC compiler which creates highly optimized executables; No external DLLs, runtime interpreter or anything else required when creating executables; Procedure and structure support for advanced programming; Full unicode support; Built-in containers like array, list and map; Strong types, strong syntax to avoid programming mistakes; Namespace support for easy code reuse; Access to full OS API for advanced programmers
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 18.2K	Stacks 540
Followers 9.4K	Followers 24
Votes 866	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 205 Performance 108 Control over memory allocation 99 Cross-platform 98 Fast 85 Object oriented Cons 8 Slow compilation 8 Unsafe 6 Fragile ABI 6 Over-complicated 5 No standard/mainstream dependency management	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Git Linux macOS Windows Visual Basic

What are some alternatives to C++, PureBasic?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

C++ vs PureBasic: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In Summary, C++ and PureBasic differ in memory management, object-oriented programming, platform independence, syntax complexity, standard libraries, and performance characteristics.

C++ vs PureBasic

Overview