StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. C++ vs WebAssembly

C++ vs WebAssembly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C++
C++
Stacks18.2K
Followers9.4K
Votes866
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Stacks223
Followers218
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks818

C++ vs WebAssembly: What are the differences?

C++ vs WebAssembly

Introduction

In web development, WebAssembly (Wasm) is becoming increasingly popular as a low-level virtual machine that allows us to run high-performance code securely in web browsers. On the other hand, C++ is a powerful and widely used programming language known for its efficiency and performance. In this article, we will explore the key differences between C++ and WebAssembly.

  1. Language Design: C++ is a high-level programming language that offers a wide range of features and abstractions, allowing developers to write complex code. In contrast, WebAssembly is a low-level, stack-based virtual machine language, which means it has a simpler design and lacks some high-level abstractions found in C++.

  2. Execution Environment: C++ code is compiled into machine code that can run on the target platform's operating system and hardware directly. WebAssembly, however, is designed to be platform-independent and runs on a virtual machine. It requires a compatible runtime environment, typically provided by modern web browsers.

  3. Portability: C++ code needs to be compiled separately for each target platform, such as Windows, Linux, or macOS. In contrast, WebAssembly code is compiled once and can run on any platform that supports the WebAssembly runtime, eliminating the need for platform-specific compilation.

  4. Garbage Collection: C++ developers have more control over memory management, allowing them to choose between manual memory management or using libraries like smart pointers. WebAssembly, in contrast, relies on garbage collection for memory management, which simplifies memory management but can introduce some performance overhead.

  5. Access to Web APIs: C++ is not directly integrated with web APIs and does not have built-in support for web-centric functionalities. WebAssembly, on the other hand, can interact seamlessly with JavaScript and access various web APIs, allowing it to leverage the full power of the web platform.

In Summary, C++ and WebAssembly differ in language design, execution environment, portability, memory management, and access to web APIs, making them suitable for different use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C++, WebAssembly

albert
albert

May 5, 2020

Needs advice

I am currently learning Back-End design, and I am confused with the term Back-End API. My question is do I need to have a webserver? That is the Browser send a http request to the Webserver, based on the URL, the Webserver will execute the WEB API and route the request to it and send back the response received from the WEB API to the browser. If so, what are the differences from the WebServer to execute a CGI in the traditional architecture?

If this is not the case, is the WEB API a standalone server/application that can process the HTTP request and send back the response to the browser? Thank you very much for clarifying...

63.7k views63.7k
Comments
Russtopia
Russtopia

Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs

Dec 8, 2019

Decided

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

<pre> $ sloc openssh-portable Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 502 112982 14327 15705 143014 100.0% C 389 105938 13349 14416 133703 93.5% Shell 92 6118 937 1129 8184 5.7% Make 16 468 37 131 636 0.4% AWK 1 363 0 7 370 0.3% C++ 3 79 4 18 101 0.1% Conf 1 16 0 4 20 0.0% $ sloc xs Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 34 3658 1231 655 5544 100.0% Go 19 3230 1199 507 4936 89.0% Markdown 2 181 0 76 257 4.6% Make 7 148 4 50 202 3.6% YAML 1 39 0 5 44 0.8% Text 1 30 0 7 37 0.7% Modula 1 16 0 2 18 0.3% Shell 3 14 28 8 50 0.9% </pre>

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

233k views233k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C++
C++
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

It is an open standard that defines a portable binary code format for executable programs, and a corresponding textual assembly language, as well as interfaces for facilitating interactions between such programs and their host environment.

-
Efficient and fast; Safe; Open and debuggable; Part of the open web platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
818
Stacks
18.2K
Stacks
223
Followers
9.4K
Followers
218
Votes
866
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 205
    Performance
  • 108
    Control over memory allocation
  • 99
    Cross-platform
  • 98
    Fast
  • 85
    Object oriented
Cons
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management
Cons
  • 2
    Security issues
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust
C lang
C lang

What are some alternatives to C++, WebAssembly?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase