StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Cyberduck vs Putty

Cyberduck vs Putty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Stacks36
Followers42
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.0K
Forks320

Cyberduck vs Putty: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Cyberduck and Putty are both popular software programs used in the field of computer networking and system administration. While Cyberduck is primarily used for file transfers and supports various protocols, Putty is commonly used for remote access to computers and network devices. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Cyberduck and Putty in more detail.

  1. Interface and Usability: Cyberduck provides a user-friendly and intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) that makes it easy for users to navigate and perform file transfers. On the other hand, Putty is a command-line interface (CLI) tool, which may require users to have more technical knowledge and experience in using command line commands for remote access tasks.

  2. Supported Protocols: Cyberduck supports a wide range of protocols including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, and more. This allows users to connect to various servers and cloud storage services effortlessly. Putty, on the other hand, is primarily focused on remote access and supports protocols such as SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin.

  3. File Transfer Capabilities: Cyberduck excels in its file transfer capabilities, providing a seamless and efficient way of transferring files between local and remote computers or servers. It offers features like drag-and-drop functionality, synchronized browsing, and support for resume and pause transfers. Putty, on the other hand, does not have built-in file transfer capabilities and requires additional tools like SCP or SFTP to perform file transfers.

  4. Tunneling and Port Forwarding: Putty offers powerful tunneling and port forwarding capabilities, allowing users to securely access remote resources through encrypted connections. This feature is particularly useful in scenarios where users need to access servers behind firewalls or establish secure connections to remote networks. Cyberduck does not have built-in tunneling and port forwarding capabilities and is primarily focused on file transfers.

  5. Operating System Compatibility: Cyberduck is designed to be compatible with macOS and Windows operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users. Putty, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows operating systems, although there are alternative versions available for macOS and Linux systems.

  6. Community and Support: Cyberduck has a large and active community of users which contributes to its development and provides support through forums and online resources. Putty also has an active community, but it is more focused on technical discussions and providing support through online documentation and user guides.

In summary, Cyberduck and Putty differ in terms of their interface and usability, supported protocols, file transfer capabilities, tunneling and port forwarding features, operating system compatibility, and community support. While Cyberduck is primarily focused on file transfers and provides a user-friendly GUI, Putty is more suited for remote access tasks and requires technical knowledge in using command line commands.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Putty
Putty
Cyberduck
Cyberduck

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.

SSH client
Easy to use interface; Share files; Edit any file with your preferred editor; Browse with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
320
Stacks
182
Stacks
36
Followers
117
Followers
42
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Dropbox
Dropbox
Google Drive
Google Drive
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Windows
Windows
Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift
OneDrive
OneDrive
macOS
macOS
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Putty, Cyberduck?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

cURL

cURL

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

WeTransfer

WeTransfer

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

Flurl

Flurl

It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.

FileZilla

FileZilla

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

WinSCP

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

HTTPie

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase