StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Cycle.js vs Kendo UI

Cycle.js vs Kendo UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
Cycle.js
Cycle.js
Stacks11
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks418

Cycle.js vs Kendo UI: What are the differences?

Developers describe Cycle.js as "A functional and reactive JavaScript framework for predictable code". A functional and reactive JavaScript framework for predictable code. On the other hand, Kendo UI is detailed as "Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset". Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Cycle.js and Kendo UI can be categorized as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

Some of the features offered by Cycle.js are:

  • RxJS
  • Reactive Frontend
  • Frontend framework

On the other hand, Kendo UI provides the following key features:

  • Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources
  • Mobile-Friendly and Responsive
  • Built-In, Customizable Themes

Cycle.js and Kendo UI are both open source tools. It seems that Cycle.js with 9.34K GitHub stars and 385 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Kendo UI with 2.16K GitHub stars and 1.73K GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Cycle.js
Cycle.js

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

A functional and reactive JavaScript framework for predictable code

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
RxJS; Reactive Frontend; Frontend framework; es6; typescript; virtual dom
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
418
Stacks
297
Stacks
11
Followers
359
Followers
23
Votes
33
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Awdawd
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Poor customizability
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
React Native
React Native
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
RxJS
RxJS

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, Cycle.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase