StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Debian vs Fedora

Debian vs Fedora

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Debian
Debian
Stacks16.4K
Followers11.2K
Votes164
Fedora
Fedora
Stacks623
Followers515
Votes97

Debian vs Fedora: What are the differences?

Differences Between Debian and Fedora

Debian and Fedora are two popular Linux distributions, each with its own set of features and characteristics. Here are six key differences between the two:

  1. Package Management System: One significant difference between Debian and Fedora is their package management systems. Debian uses the Advanced Package Tool (APT), while Fedora utilizes the Yellowdog Updater, Modified (yum) package management system. APT is known for its robustness and extensive package availability, while yum focuses more on fast and reliable package installation.

  2. Release Frequency and Stability: Debian and Fedora also differ in terms of their release frequency and stability. Debian tends to have longer release cycles, focusing more on stability and long-term support. On the other hand, Fedora has a more frequent release cycle, providing users with the latest features and updates but with slightly less stability.

  3. Community Involvement: Both Debian and Fedora have active communities, but their involvement and governance structures differ. Debian has a highly decentralized community-driven approach, with various development teams and democratic decision-making processes. In contrast, Fedora's development is closely tied to the Red Hat company, with a more centralized decision-making structure.

  4. Default Software Selection: Another difference lies in the default software selection of the distributions. Debian mainly includes free and open-source software, focusing on stability and security. In comparison, Fedora embraces a broader range of open-source software, including bleeding-edge technologies, to provide a more cutting-edge experience for users.

  5. Purpose and Target Audience: Debian and Fedora also have different target audiences and purposes. Debian is known as a versatile and adaptable distribution suitable for a wide range of users, from beginners to advanced users. Fedora, being the community-based testing ground for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), caters more to developers, enthusiasts, and those interested in bleeding-edge technologies.

  6. Supported Architectures: The two distributions also differ in terms of the architectures they support. Debian is well-known for supporting a wide range of architectures, including x86, ARM, PowerPC, and more. Fedora, while also offering a fair number of architectures, has a narrower focus on x86_64 and ARM.

In summary, Debian and Fedora differ in their package management systems, release frequency and stability, community involvement, default software selection, purpose and target audience, and supported architectures. These distinctions make each distribution suitable for different use cases and user preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Debian, Fedora

Dimelo
Dimelo

Nov 10, 2020

Decided

Coming from a Debian-based Linux background, using the Ubuntu base image for my Docker containers was a natural choice. However, the overhead, even on the impressively-slimmed Hub images, was hard to justify. Seeking to create images that were "just right" in size, without unused packages or dependencies, I made the switch to Alpine.

Alpine's modified BusyBox has a surprising amount of functionality, and the package repository contains plenty of muslc-safe versions of commonly-used packages. It's been a valuable exercise in doing more with less, and, as Alpine is keen to point out, an image with fewer packages makes for a more sustainable environment with a smaller attack surface.

My only regret is that Alpine's documentation leaves a lot to be desired.

66.6k views66.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Statistics
Stacks
16.4K
Stacks
623
Followers
11.2K
Followers
515
Votes
164
Votes
97
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 54
    Massively supported
  • 50
    Stable
  • 21
    Reliable
  • 9
    Aptitude
  • 8
    Customizable
Cons
  • 10
    Old versions of software
  • 2
    Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian
Pros
  • 23
    Great for developers
  • 10
    Great integration with system tools
  • 10
    Good release schedule
  • 10
    Represents the future of rhel/centos
  • 8
    Reliable
Cons
  • 3
    Bugs get fixed slowly from kernel side
  • 2
    Much less support from Wiki
  • 2
    Systemd
  • 2
    Boring
  • 1
    Learning curve for new users

What are some alternatives to Debian, Fedora?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase