Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Debian vs Manjaro: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Debian and Manjaro
Debian and Manjaro are both popular Linux distributions, but they have several key differences that set them apart.
Package Management: Debian uses the apt package manager, while Manjaro uses the pacman package manager. Apt is known for its robustness and vast software repository, while pacman is praised for its speed and efficiency.
Release Cycle: Debian follows a stable release cycle, which means that software updates are thoroughly tested and released less frequently. Manjaro, on the other hand, follows a rolling release model, which means that updates are constantly released and users have access to the latest software versions.
User Base: Debian is known for its large and diverse user base, including both beginner and advanced users. Manjaro, on the other hand, is popular among intermediate to advanced users who prefer a more bleeding-edge and user-friendly experience.
Installation Process: Debian offers a variety of installation options, including a net-install option for experienced users and a graphical installer for beginners. Manjaro provides a user-friendly graphical installer that simplifies the installation process, making it easier for users to set up the system.
Default Desktop Environment: Debian does not come with a default desktop environment, allowing users to choose their preferred environment during installation. Manjaro, on the other hand, comes with the Xfce desktop environment by default, providing a lightweight and customizable user interface.
Community Support: Debian has a large and active community that provides extensive support and resources for users. Manjaro also has a supportive community, but it may be relatively smaller compared to Debian.
In summary, the key differences between Debian and Manjaro lie in their package management systems, release cycles, target user base, installation process, default desktop environment, and community support. Debian focuses on stability and versatility, while Manjaro offers a more cutting-edge and user-friendly experience.
I liked manjaro a lot, the huge support it has and the variety of tools it provides is just awesome. But due to its parent platform being Arch Linux it has bleeding-edge technology and that meaning, we get updated 'daily', and if we keep updating the system daily, due to the bugs in the recent updates the system sometimes used to crash, this made the OS really unstable. However, one can avoid such crashes using periodical and careful system/package updates. I now use LinuxMint which is based on Ubuntu, and this OS is completely stable with reliable(mostly tested) updates. And, since this OS is backed up by UBUNTU the concerns/questions one can encounter while using the OS can be easily rectified using the UBUNTU community, which is pretty good. Though this is backed up on UBUNTU it most certainly does NOT include the proprietary stuff of UBUNTU, which is on the bright side of the OS. That's it! Happy Computing.
Pros of Debian
- Massively supported54
- Stable50
- Reliable21
- Aptitude9
- Customizable8
- It is free8
- Turnkey linux use it8
- Works on all architectures6
Pros of Manjaro
- Good for beginners9
- AUR is huge8
- Very stable6
- Friendly community5
- Pacman is very fast3
- Highly customizable2
- Nice-looking bootloader2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Debian
- Old versions of software10
- Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian2
Cons of Manjaro
- Would you give your grandma linux?6
- Occasional freezes if wrongly configured3
- Not highly stable2
- High data requirement frequently1