StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Deno vs Rome

Deno vs Rome

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Deno
Deno
Stacks364
Followers474
Votes93
Rome
Rome
Stacks26
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.6K
Forks650

Deno vs Rome : What are the differences?

Introduction

Deno and Rome are two popular JavaScript tools used for different purposes. While Deno is a runtime environment for executing JavaScript and TypeScript code, Rome is a linter, formatter, and compiler tool for JavaScript and TypeScript.

  1. Runtime Environment vs Tool Suite: Deno is a JavaScript and TypeScript runtime environment that allows developers to execute code on the server-side or the command line. On the other hand, Rome is not a runtime environment but a comprehensive tool suite that provides features like linting, formatting, and compiling code.

  2. Creator and Community: Deno was created by Ryan Dahl, the creator of Node.js, and it has gained significant attention and support from the JavaScript community. Rome, on the other hand, is a relatively newer tool created by Sebastian McKenzie, known for his contributions to popular JavaScript tools like Babel and Yarn.

  3. Built-in Modules vs Centralized Tool: Deno comes with a set of built-in modules that provide essential functionalities like file system access, HTTP server, and testing. These built-in modules can be imported directly in Deno projects. Rome, on the other hand, does not provide built-in modules but rather acts as a centralized tool that helps developers manage and utilize other existing tools and libraries.

  4. Compatibility and Ecosystem: Deno aims to have compatibility with the existing Node.js ecosystem. It can run most existing Node.js packages with little to no modifications. Rome, on the other hand, has a more opinionated approach and provides its own set of tools and utilities. While Rome can be used alongside other tools, it may require additional configuration and modifications to integrate with existing workflows.

  5. Bundle and Dependency Management: Deno has built-in support for bundling and dependency management. It allows developers to bundle their code and dependencies into a single JavaScript file, making it easier to distribute and deploy applications. Rome, on the other hand, focuses more on code formatting, linting, and compilation, and does not provide direct support for bundle management. Developers using Rome may need to use additional tools or configure external bundlers for this purpose.

  6. Security Model: Deno has a security model based on permissions, where each permission needs to be explicitly granted to the code before it can access the corresponding resources or functionalities. This approach enhances security by reducing the attack surface. Rome, on the other hand, does not have a built-in security model like Deno. It relies on the security features provided by the underlying runtime or environment.

In Summary, Deno is a JavaScript and TypeScript runtime environment that comes with built-in modules and focuses on compatibility with the existing Node.js ecosystem, while Rome is a tool suite that provides code formatting, linting, and compilation features but does not have built-in modules or direct support for bundling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Deno
Deno
Rome
Rome

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

It is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.

Dependency inspector ; Code formatter; Bundling ; Runtime type info
Open Source; Compiler; Linter; Formatter; Bundler; Testing framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
23.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
650
Stacks
364
Stacks
26
Followers
474
Followers
12
Votes
93
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Typescript
  • 14
    Secure
  • 13
    Open source
  • 9
    Great std library
  • 9
    Javascript
Cons
  • 3
    Still in early development
  • 1
    Bad Rust plugin support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
TypeScript
TypeScript
Rust
Rust
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Deno, Rome ?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Babel

Babel

Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase