StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Django REST framework vs Gin Gonic

Django REST framework vs Gin Gonic

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.1K
Votes312
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks393
Followers340
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K

Django REST framework vs Gin Gonic: What are the differences?

Introduction

Django REST framework and Gin Gonic are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. While Django REST framework is specifically designed for building APIs with the Django web framework, Gin Gonic is a lightweight framework built for building web applications in Go. There are several key differences between these two frameworks that developers should be aware of.

  1. Language: The most fundamental difference between Django REST framework and Gin Gonic is the programming language used. Django REST framework is written in Python, while Gin Gonic is written in Go. This means that developers with expertise in Python may find Django REST framework more suitable for their projects, while those familiar with Go may prefer using Gin Gonic.

  2. Framework Ecosystem: Django REST framework is built on top of the well-established Django web framework, which provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for developing web applications. This means that developers using Django REST framework can leverage the extensive Django ecosystem, including its ORM, authentication system, and admin interface. On the other hand, Gin Gonic is a lightweight framework with a smaller ecosystem. Developers using Gin Gonic have more flexibility to choose third-party libraries and tools based on their specific needs.

  3. Performance: Due to its lightweight nature and the fact that it is written in Go, Gin Gonic is known for its high performance and low memory footprint. Go's concurrency model allows Gin Gonic to handle a large number of requests concurrently, making it suitable for high-performance applications. Django REST framework, on the other hand, may not be as performant as Gin Gonic in certain scenarios, especially when it comes to handling a high number of concurrent requests.

  4. Learning Curve: Django REST framework is known for its extensive documentation and ease of use, making it a popular choice for developers who are new to web development or the Django ecosystem. It provides a high-level abstraction that simplifies common tasks, such as serialization, authentication, and validation. Gin Gonic, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with the Go programming language. It requires a deeper understanding of the underlying HTTP concepts and the Go programming language itself.

  5. Flexibility: Django REST framework provides a lot of built-in functionality out of the box, which makes it easy to get started quickly. However, this can also limit the level of flexibility and customization that developers have. Gin Gonic, on the other hand, takes a more minimalist approach, allowing developers to have more control over the design and architecture of their application. This makes Gin Gonic suitable for projects that require a high level of customization and fine-grained control over the application's behavior.

  6. Community and Support: Django REST framework benefits from a large and active community of developers, which means that there are plenty of resources available, including tutorials, examples, and community support. Gin Gonic, while also having a supportive community, may not have the same level of resources and support as Django REST framework, due to its smaller user base. This can make it slightly more challenging to find solutions to specific problems or seek help when needed.

In summary, Django REST framework and Gin Gonic have key differences in terms of the programming language used, framework ecosystem, performance, learning curve, flexibility, and community support. Developers should consider these factors when choosing between the two frameworks based on their specific requirements and expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django REST framework, Gin Gonic

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

The Web browsable API is a huge usability win for your developers.;Authentication policies including OAuth1a and OAuth2 out of the box.;Serialization that supports both ORM and non-ORM data sources.;Customizable all the way down - just use regular function-based views if you don't need the more powerful features.;Extensive documentation, and great community support.;Used and trusted by large companies such as Mozilla and Eventbrite.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.5K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
393
Followers
2.1K
Followers
340
Votes
312
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 67
    Easy to use
  • 65
    Browsable api
  • 53
    Great documentation
  • 51
    Customizable
  • 42
    Fast development
Cons
  • 2
    Bad documentation
  • 2
    Reimplements Django functionality
  • 1
    No support for URL Namespaces
  • 0
    Bad CSRF handling
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing
Integrations
Rollbar
Rollbar
Sentry
Sentry
Django
Django
Stream
Stream
Kloudless
Kloudless
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Django REST framework, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase