StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Django REST framework vs Starlette

Django REST framework vs Starlette

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.1K
Votes312
Starlette
Starlette
Stacks44
Followers21
Votes0

Django REST framework vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Django REST framework and Starlette:

  1. Routing and URL Handling: Django REST framework (DRF) provides a built-in URL routing system, where developers can define their API endpoints using a simple and intuitive syntax. On the other hand, Starlette requires developers to handle routing manually, allowing for more flexibility and control.

  2. Performance and Scalability: Starlette is designed to be a high-performance asynchronous framework, leveraging the power of asynchronous programming models like asyncio. It is well-suited for building scalable and efficient APIs that can handle a large number of concurrent requests. DRF, while being powerful, does not have the same level of scalability and performance out of the box.

  3. Authentication and Authorization: DRF has robust and versatile authentication and authorization capabilities, supporting various authentication schemes such as token-based authentication, session authentication, and OAuth. Starlette, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that does not provide built-in authentication and authorization features. Developers have the freedom to choose and integrate their preferred authentication and authorization systems.

  4. Database Support: DRF is tightly integrated with Django's powerful ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) system, which provides seamless support for various databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle. Starlette, being a more minimalistic framework, does not have built-in ORM support but allows developers to use any asynchronous-compatible database libraries or ORM.

  5. Middleware and Request/Response Handling: DRF provides extensive middleware support for handling requests and responses, enabling developers to easily implement features like CSRF protection, caching, and logging. Starlette also supports middleware but follows a more lightweight approach, allowing developers to write their own request/response handlers with greater control and customization options.

  6. Scalability and Extensibility: In terms of scalability and extensibility, DRF provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for building complex APIs quickly. It has a large and active community, offering a wide range of third-party packages, extensions, and integrations. Starlette, while not as feature-rich as DRF, is highly extensible and allows developers to add custom functionality using its lightweight architecture.

In summary, Django REST framework offers a more opinionated and feature-rich approach to building RESTful APIs, providing convenient tools for routing, authentication, and database integration. On the other hand, Starlette is a lightweight and high-performance asynchronous framework, offering greater flexibility and control over routing and request handling, but with less built-in functionality and database support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Starlette
Starlette

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

It is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit, which is ideal for building high performance asyncio services.

The Web browsable API is a huge usability win for your developers.;Authentication policies including OAuth1a and OAuth2 out of the box.;Serialization that supports both ORM and non-ORM data sources.;Customizable all the way down - just use regular function-based views if you don't need the more powerful features.;Extensive documentation, and great community support.;Used and trusted by large companies such as Mozilla and Eventbrite.
Seriously impressive performance; WebSocket support; GraphQL support; In-process background tasks; Startup and shutdown events; Test client built on requests; CORS, GZip, Static Files, Streaming responses; Session and Cookie support
Statistics
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
44
Followers
2.1K
Followers
21
Votes
312
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 67
    Easy to use
  • 65
    Browsable api
  • 53
    Great documentation
  • 51
    Customizable
  • 42
    Fast development
Cons
  • 2
    Reimplements Django functionality
  • 2
    Bad documentation
  • 1
    No support for URL Namespaces
  • 0
    Bad CSRF handling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rollbar
Rollbar
Sentry
Sentry
Django
Django
Stream
Stream
Kloudless
Kloudless
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Django REST framework, Starlette?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase