StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django vs webapp2

Django vs webapp2

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
webapp2
webapp2
Stacks15
Followers34
Votes0

Django vs webapp2: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Django and webapp2

Django and webapp2 are both web frameworks used for building web applications. While they share similarities in certain aspects, they also have distinct differences. Here are six key differences between Django and webapp2:

  1. Architecture and Design Philosophy: Django follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, where the model represents the data, the view handles the user interface, and the controller manages the flow between them. On the other hand, webapp2 follows a simpler web framework model-view-controller (MVC) design pattern, where the controller is responsible for handling the requests and the models and views are created manually.

  2. URL Routing: In Django, URL routing is done through a powerful and flexible system known as the URLconf. It allows for the mapping of URLs to view functions or class-based views. In webapp2, URL routing is achieved through a straightforward routing mechanism where URLs are mapped to request handler classes using regular expressions.

  3. Template Engine: Django comes with a built-in template engine that provides a convenient way to generate HTML dynamically. It offers features like template inheritance, template tags, and filters. In contrast, webapp2 does not include a template engine by default. However, it can be integrated with various third-party template engines for rendering HTML.

  4. Database Support: Django provides a high-level object-relational mapping (ORM) layer that abstracts the underlying database. It supports multiple databases and offers features like database migrations, query optimization, and advanced querying capabilities. On the other hand, webapp2 does not include a built-in ORM. Developers have to manually handle database operations using lower-level database APIs.

  5. Authentication and Authorization: Django has a comprehensive authentication system that includes user registration, login, password management, and session handling. It also provides a flexible authorization mechanism through the concept of permissions and groups. In webapp2, authentication and authorization need to be implemented manually or using third-party libraries as it does not have built-in support for these functionalities.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Django has a large and active community with a vast ecosystem of reusable apps, plugins, and packages available. This makes it easier for developers to find solutions to common problems and extend the functionality of their Django applications. While webapp2 also has a community and some third-party libraries, it is not as extensive as the Django ecosystem.

In summary, Django and webapp2 differ in their architecture, URL routing mechanism, template engine support, database handling, authentication and authorization capabilities, and their respective communities and ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, webapp2

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
webapp2
webapp2

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

webapp2 is a simple. it follows the simplicity of webapp, but improves it in some ways: it adds better URI routing and exception handling, a full featured response object and a more flexible dispatching mechanism.

-
Compatible with webapp;Compatible with latest WebOb;Full-featured response object;Status code exceptions;Improved exception handling;Lazy handlers;Keyword arguments from URI;Positional arguments from URI;Returned responses;Custom handler methods;View functions;More flexible dispatching mechanism;Domain and subdomain routing;Match HTTP methods or URI schemes;URI builder;Redirection for legacy URIs;Simple, well-tested and documented;Independent of the App Engine SDK;Future proof;Same performance;Extras
Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
15
Followers
34.8K
Followers
34
Votes
4.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
Python
Python
Google App Engine
Google App Engine

What are some alternatives to Django, webapp2?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase