Docker vs JBoss

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

JBoss

Stacks457

Followers255

Votes0

Docker vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker and JBoss are two widely used technologies in the field of software development and deployment. While both serve the purpose of application deployment, they have significant differences that set them apart. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker and JBoss.

Isolation and Portability: Docker provides containerization, which allows applications to run in isolated environments. It ensures that the application and its dependencies are bundled together, making it highly portable across different platforms and operating systems. On the other hand, JBoss is an application server that provides a runtime environment for Java-based applications. It offers a comprehensive set of services and APIs for enterprise applications but does not provide the same level of isolation and portability as Docker.
Resource Utilization: Docker containers are lightweight and share the underlying host operating system's kernel. This allows for better resource utilization as multiple containers can run on the same host system without significant performance degradation. JBoss, being an application server, requires dedicated resources for each running instance, which can result in higher resource consumption and lower scalability compared to Docker.
Deployment Flexibility: Docker allows for easy and flexible deployment of applications by packaging them into containers. These containers can be deployed on any Docker-enabled host, making it suitable for both local and cloud-based deployments. On the other hand, JBoss relies on traditional deployment methods, such as deploying applications in a WAR (Web Application Archive) format, which may require additional configuration and setup.
Service Orchestration: Docker provides built-in support for service orchestration through tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes. It allows for managing and scaling containerized applications across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. JBoss, being an application server, can be deployed in a clustered environment but may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of service orchestration as offered by Docker.
Containerization vs. Full Application Server: Docker provides lightweight containerization, where each container runs a single application or service. This enables modular and scalable deployment of applications. JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a complete runtime environment for Java-based applications. It includes services like messaging, caching, and clustering, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Docker has a large and vibrant community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support. It has a vast ecosystem of tools, frameworks, and libraries built around it, making it easy to integrate with existing workflows and tools. JBoss, being a popular and widely adopted application server, also has a strong community and ecosystem but may not be as diverse and extensive as Docker.

In summary, Docker provides lightweight containerization with high portability, resource efficiency, and flexible deployment options, while JBoss is a comprehensive application server offering a wide range of services but with less isolation, portability, and deployment flexibility compared to Docker.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, JBoss

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	JBoss
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	-
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 457
Followers 143.8K	Followers 255
Votes 3.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, JBoss?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Introduction

Isolation and Portability: Docker provides containerization, which allows applications to run in isolated environments. It ensures that the application and its dependencies are bundled together, making it highly portable across different platforms and operating systems. On the other hand, JBoss is an application server that provides a runtime environment for Java-based applications. It offers a comprehensive set of services and APIs for enterprise applications but does not provide the same level of isolation and portability as Docker.
Resource Utilization: Docker containers are lightweight and share the underlying host operating system's kernel. This allows for better resource utilization as multiple containers can run on the same host system without significant performance degradation. JBoss, being an application server, requires dedicated resources for each running instance, which can result in higher resource consumption and lower scalability compared to Docker.
Deployment Flexibility: Docker allows for easy and flexible deployment of applications by packaging them into containers. These containers can be deployed on any Docker-enabled host, making it suitable for both local and cloud-based deployments. On the other hand, JBoss relies on traditional deployment methods, such as deploying applications in a WAR (Web Application Archive) format, which may require additional configuration and setup.
Service Orchestration: Docker provides built-in support for service orchestration through tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes. It allows for managing and scaling containerized applications across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. JBoss, being an application server, can be deployed in a clustered environment but may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of service orchestration as offered by Docker.
Containerization vs. Full Application Server: Docker provides lightweight containerization, where each container runs a single application or service. This enables modular and scalable deployment of applications. JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a complete runtime environment for Java-based applications. It includes services like messaging, caching, and clustering, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Docker has a large and vibrant community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support. It has a vast ecosystem of tools, frameworks, and libraries built around it, making it easy to integrate with existing workflows and tools. JBoss, being a popular and widely adopted application server, also has a strong community and ecosystem but may not be as diverse and extensive as Docker.

Docker vs JBoss

Overview

Docker vs JBoss: What are the differences?