StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. Docker vs Rocket

Docker vs Rocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K
Rocket
Rocket
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes12

Docker vs Rocket: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Docker and Rocket

Docker is a containerization platform that focuses on ease of use and portability, allowing developers to easily package, share, and run applications in isolated environments. On the other hand, Rocket, now known as Podman, is a containerization tool that emphasizes security, speed, and compatibility with different container runtimes. 

1. **Architecture**: Docker uses a client-server architecture, where the Docker client communicates with the Docker daemon to manage containers. Rocket, on the other hand, is designed as a standalone binary without any daemon running in the background, providing a simpler and potentially more secure approach. 

2. **Isolation**: Docker uses a containerd runtime, which provides a higher level of isolation by default, utilizing namespaces, cgroups, and capabilities to securely isolate containers. Rocket, on the other hand, relies on rkt as its runtime, which offers a minimal level of isolation with a focus on simplicity and speed. 

3. **Image Format**: Docker uses the Docker image format, which includes metadata, layers, and a manifest that describes how to run a specific container. Rocket utilizes the App Container (appc) spec, focusing on simplicity and composability by separating the image specification from the execution environment. 

4. **Orchestration**: Docker has built-in orchestration tools like Docker Swarm and Docker Compose for managing clusters of containers and defining multi-container applications. Rocket, on the other hand, does not have native orchestration tools but can be integrated with Kubernetes, making it suitable for more complex containerized environments. 

5. **Community Support**: Docker has a larger community and ecosystem with extensive documentation, plugins, and third-party tools that make it easy to adopt and integrate with existing workflows. Rocket, on the other hand, has a smaller but dedicated community that values security and compatibility with other container technologies. 

In Summary, Docker and Rocket (Podman) differ in terms of architecture, isolation mechanisms, image formats, orchestration capabilities, and community support, catering to different preferences and requirements in the containerization space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker
Docker
Rocket
Rocket

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
Stacks
194.2K
Stacks
91
Followers
143.8K
Followers
176
Votes
3.9K
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
Cons
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly
Integrations
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Docker, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot