TypeScript vs doT.js

Overview

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

doT.js

Stacks6

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.0K

Forks1.0K

TypeScript vs doT.js: What are the differences?

Static vs Dynamic Typing: TypeScript is a statically typed language, meaning that variable types are known at compile time, helping to catch potential errors early in the development process. In contrast, doT.js is a dynamic templating language where variable types are resolved at runtime, offering more flexibility but potentially introducing errors that might not be caught until runtime.
Language vs Template Engine: TypeScript is a full-fledged programming language that compiles down to JavaScript, allowing for the use of classes, interfaces, modules, and other advanced language features. On the other hand, doT.js is primarily a template engine used for generating HTML markup from data, focusing on simplifying the task of rendering dynamic content on the client-side.
Compilation Process: In TypeScript, code is compiled before execution to plain JavaScript, ensuring compatibility with all browsers and providing the benefit of type checking. doT.js, however, does not require a compilation step as it is directly interpreted by the browser, making it more lightweight and suitable for quick prototyping or small-scale projects.
Community Support and Ecosystem: TypeScript has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tools, and libraries available for building complex applications. On the other hand, while doT.js also has a supportive community, it is more focused on templating needs and may not offer as wide a range of resources for other aspects of development.
Error Handling and Debugging: Due to its static typing nature, TypeScript can help prevent a wide range of errors during development and provides detailed error messages to aid debugging. In contrast, doT.js may be more prone to runtime errors related to variable types or data manipulation, requiring a thorough testing approach to ensure the reliability of the templates.
Use Cases and Scope: TypeScript is commonly used for building large-scale applications, especially in the context of frontend development with frameworks like Angular or React. doT.js, however, is typically utilized for smaller projects or focusing solely on templating needs within a larger web application, offering a simpler and more lightweight solution for those specific tasks.

In Summary, TypeScript and doT.js differ in their approach to typing, language features, compilation process, community support, error handling, and preferred use cases in development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on TypeScript, doT.js

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

TypeScript	doT.js
TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.	It is a fastest and concise javascript template engine for Node.js and browsers. It was created in search of the fastest and concise JavaScript templating function with emphasis on performance under V8 and Node.js. It shows great performance for both Node.js and browsers.
-	No dependencies, 120 loc; Extremely fast; Custom delimiters; Runtime evaluation; Runtime interpolation; Compile-time evaluation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 106.6K	GitHub Stars 5.0K
GitHub Forks 13.1K	GitHub Forks 1.0K
Stacks 105.1K	Stacks 6
Followers 74.2K	Followers 19
Votes 503	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	gulp Node.js JavaScript Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to TypeScript, doT.js?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

TypeScript vs doT.js: What are the differences?

Static vs Dynamic Typing: TypeScript is a statically typed language, meaning that variable types are known at compile time, helping to catch potential errors early in the development process. In contrast, doT.js is a dynamic templating language where variable types are resolved at runtime, offering more flexibility but potentially introducing errors that might not be caught until runtime.
Language vs Template Engine: TypeScript is a full-fledged programming language that compiles down to JavaScript, allowing for the use of classes, interfaces, modules, and other advanced language features. On the other hand, doT.js is primarily a template engine used for generating HTML markup from data, focusing on simplifying the task of rendering dynamic content on the client-side.
Compilation Process: In TypeScript, code is compiled before execution to plain JavaScript, ensuring compatibility with all browsers and providing the benefit of type checking. doT.js, however, does not require a compilation step as it is directly interpreted by the browser, making it more lightweight and suitable for quick prototyping or small-scale projects.
Community Support and Ecosystem: TypeScript has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tools, and libraries available for building complex applications. On the other hand, while doT.js also has a supportive community, it is more focused on templating needs and may not offer as wide a range of resources for other aspects of development.
Error Handling and Debugging: Due to its static typing nature, TypeScript can help prevent a wide range of errors during development and provides detailed error messages to aid debugging. In contrast, doT.js may be more prone to runtime errors related to variable types or data manipulation, requiring a thorough testing approach to ensure the reliability of the templates.
Use Cases and Scope: TypeScript is commonly used for building large-scale applications, especially in the context of frontend development with frameworks like Angular or React. doT.js, however, is typically utilized for smaller projects or focusing solely on templating needs within a larger web application, offering a simpler and more lightweight solution for those specific tasks.

In Summary, TypeScript and doT.js differ in their approach to typing, language features, compilation process, community support, error handling, and preferred use cases in development projects.

TypeScript vs doT.js

Overview