.NET Core vs FullStack Boilerplate

Overview

.NET Core

Stacks7.0K

Followers2.6K

Votes155

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

FullStack Boilerplate

Stacks7

Followers30

Votes0

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

.NET Core vs FullStack Boilerplate: What are the differences?

Developers describe .NET Core as "An Open Source, General-Purpose Development Platform Maintained by Microsoft and the .NET Community". Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications. On the other hand, FullStack Boilerplate is detailed as "React Native Web with TypeScript, Node.js & GraphQL". The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.

.NET Core and FullStack Boilerplate can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

.NET Core and FullStack Boilerplate are both open source tools. It seems that FullStack Boilerplate with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.83K forks on GitHub has more adoption than .NET Core with 11.2K GitHub stars and 2.41K GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET Core, FullStack Boilerplate

Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k

Comments

Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET Core	FullStack Boilerplate
Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.	The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.
Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 7.0K	Stacks 7
Followers 2.6K	Followers 30
Votes 155	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 30 Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff 27 Fast 26 Cross-platform 25 Great performance 18 All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux C# Visual Studio Code Sublime Text .NET Visual Studio ASP.NET Vim Visual Basic F#	TypeScript Apollo React Native GraphQL Node.js MongoDB

What are some alternatives to .NET Core, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

.NET Core vs FullStack Boilerplate