.NET Core vs Volt

Overview

Volt

Stacks19

Followers54

Votes26

GitHub Stars3.2K

Forks194

.NET Core

Stacks7.0K

Followers2.6K

Votes155

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

.NET Core vs Volt: What are the differences?

.NET Core: An Open Source, General-Purpose Development Platform Maintained by Microsoft and the .NET Community. Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications; Volt: A ruby web framework where your ruby runs on both server and client. Volt is a ruby web framework where your ruby code runs on both the server and the client (via opal.) The DOM automatically update as the user interacts with the page. Page state can be stored in the URL, if the user hits a URL directly, the HTML will first be rendered on the server for faster load times and easier indexing by search engines.

.NET Core and Volt can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Some of the features offered by .NET Core are:

Cross-platform
Consistent across architectures
Command-line tools

On the other hand, Volt provides the following key features:

Instead of syncing data between the client and server via HTTP, volt uses a persistent connection between the client and server
When data is updated on one client, it is updated in the database and any other listening clients (with almost no setup code needed)
Pages HTML is written in a handlebars like template language

"Great performance" is the primary reason why developers consider .NET Core over the competitors, whereas "Handlebars" was stated as the key factor in picking Volt.

.NET Core and Volt are both open source tools. .NET Core with 11.2K GitHub stars and 2.41K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Volt with 3.3K GitHub stars and 209 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Volt, .NET Core

Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k

Comments

Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Volt	.NET Core
Volt is a ruby web framework where your ruby code runs on both the server and the client (via opal.) The DOM automatically update as the user interacts with the page. Page state can be stored in the URL, if the user hits a URL directly, the HTML will first be rendered on the server for faster load times and easier indexing by search engines.	Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.
Instead of syncing data between the client and server via HTTP, volt uses a persistent connection between the client and server;When data is updated on one client, it is updated in the database and any other listening clients (with almost no setup code needed);Pages HTML is written in a handlebars like template language;Volt uses data flow/reactive programming to automatically and intelligently propagate changes to the DOM (or anything other code wanting to know when a value updates)	Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.2K	GitHub Stars 21.7K
GitHub Forks 194	GitHub Forks 4.9K
Stacks 19	Stacks 7.0K
Followers 54	Followers 2.6K
Votes 26	Votes 155
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Rich web applications 3 Holy Grail (Server-Client) 3 Reactive Web Framework 3 Open source 3 Ruby client side	Pros 30 Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff 27 Fast 26 Cross-platform 25 Great performance 18 All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)
Integrations
Ruby	Linux C# Visual Studio Code Sublime Text .NET Visual Studio ASP.NET Vim Visual Basic F#

What are some alternatives to Volt, .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by .NET Core are:

Cross-platform
Consistent across architectures
Command-line tools

On the other hand, Volt provides the following key features:

Instead of syncing data between the client and server via HTTP, volt uses a persistent connection between the client and server
When data is updated on one client, it is updated in the database and any other listening clients (with almost no setup code needed)
Pages HTML is written in a handlebars like template language

"Great performance" is the primary reason why developers consider .NET Core over the competitors, whereas "Handlebars" was stated as the key factor in picking Volt.

.NET Core vs Volt