StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Helix

.NET vs Helix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Helix
Helix
Stacks11
Followers16
Votes0

.NET vs Helix: What are the differences?

## .NET vs Helix

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Architecture**: .NET is a technology framework developed by Microsoft, whereas Helix is a modular architectural approach used in Sitecore projects. .NET is a programming platform that provides various tools and libraries for building different types of applications, while Helix focuses on creating flexible and maintainable software by dividing a project into modules with clear responsibilities and dependencies.
2. **Language Support**: .NET supports multiple programming languages such as C#, F#, and Visual Basic.NET, allowing developers to choose the language that best suits their needs. On the other hand, Helix does not dictate a specific programming language and can be used with any language that is supported by the Sitecore platform, providing more flexibility in development.
3. **Scalability**: .NET provides scalability through features like Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WWF) for building distributed and scalable applications. Helix, on the other hand, helps in achieving scalability by promoting a modular architecture that makes it easier to add new features and extend the system without affecting the existing functionality.
4. **Development Process**: In .NET, the development process can vary based on the specific framework or technology being used within the .NET ecosystem, such as ASP.NET for web development or Xamarin for mobile app development. In contrast, Helix defines a set of guidelines and best practices for organizing projects in Sitecore, making it easier for development teams to collaborate and maintain consistency across different projects.
5. **Community Support**: .NET has a vast community of developers and resources available for learning and troubleshooting, ranging from official documentation to community forums and online tutorials. However, Helix is more niche and specific to Sitecore development, so the community support may be more limited compared to the broader .NET community.
6. **Vendor Lock-in**: .NET is a technology developed by Microsoft, which may lead to concerns about vendor lock-in for some organizations. On the other hand, Helix is an architectural approach that can be implemented on top of the Sitecore platform, providing more flexibility and reducing dependency on a specific vendor.

In Summary, .NET and Helix offer distinct advantages in terms of architecture, language support, scalability, development process, community support, and vendor lock-in. These differences make them suitable for different types of projects and development requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Helix

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Helix
Helix

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Helix allows you to write Ruby classes in Rust without having to write the glue code yourself.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
11
Followers
5.9K
Followers
16
Votes
1.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
No community feedback yet
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
Ruby
Ruby
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to .NET, Helix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase