StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs PHP-MVC

.NET vs PHP-MVC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

.NET vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Syntax: The key difference between .NET and PHP-MVC is the syntax they use. .NET uses C# or Visual Basic as its programming languages, which have a strong typing system and follow a more object-oriented approach. On the other hand, PHP-MVC uses PHP as its programming language, which is loosely typed and follows a more scripting-like approach.

  2. 2. Platform: Another major difference is the platform they run on. .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft and primarily runs on the Windows operating system, although it is also supported on other platforms such as Linux and macOS through .NET Core. In contrast, PHP-MVC is a web development framework that is platform independent and can run on various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.

  3. 3. Performance: Performance is also a differentiating factor between .NET and PHP-MVC. .NET is known for its performance optimizations, as it compiles code into machine language to achieve faster execution. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is an interpreted language, which means it is run directly by an interpreter without the need for compilation. While it is possible to enhance PHP-MVC's performance through caching mechanisms, it generally lags behind .NET in terms of raw performance.

  4. 4. Development Tools: The development tools available for .NET and PHP-MVC also differ. .NET has a wide range of integrated development environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code, which provide robust debugging and code analysis capabilities. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, has IDEs like PhpStorm and Sublime Text, but they may not offer the same level of sophistication as .NET IDEs.

  5. 5. Community and Support: The community and support for .NET and PHP-MVC vary as well. .NET has a large and active community, with Microsoft providing comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. Additionally, there are numerous third-party libraries and frameworks available for .NET development. PHP-MVC also has a significant community, but it may not be as extensive as .NET's. However, PHP-MVC benefits from a long-standing presence and a wide range of available resources, including online forums, documentation, and tutorials.

  6. 6. Scalability: Scalability is an essential aspect when considering the differences between .NET and PHP-MVC. .NET is known for its scalability, making it suitable for building large-scale enterprise applications that require high performance and reliability. It has features like multi-threading and parallel programming, which enable it to handle a high volume of requests efficiently. PHP-MVC, while capable of handling moderate loads, may face challenges when scaling to handle extremely high traffic or complex computing requirements.

In summary, .NET and PHP-MVC differ in terms of syntax, platform compatibility, performance, development tools, community and support, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, PHP-MVC

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

  • It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).

  • It's been around for longer.

  • it has better documentation and community.

  • One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.

  • Rail's front end support is starting to waver.

  • C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.

  • Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Noe
Noe

Software Engineer

Aug 13, 2021

Decided

Node Js have worked incredible great for me on every project I had. It is fast enough to support big and small apps, you do not have to worry about performance, because it is very capable of building a big REST API.

One advantage is that the learning curve is lower when you have used javascript on web browser as frontend, so, it is easy to migrate from Frontend to Backend with node.

Node Package Manager (NPM) has an incredible amount of packages from many developers, so you can use them on your project as you need them.

Code is easy to support, way different than Java Legacy code.

114k views114k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
106
Followers
5.9K
Followers
222
Votes
1.9K
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to .NET, PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase