StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs React

.NET vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K

.NET vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, two popular technologies are .NET and React. While both are used for building web applications, they have key differences that set them apart. This Markdown code provides a comparison between .NET and React, highlighting their distinct features.

  1. Language and Framework: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft that supports multiple programming languages like C#, VB.NET, and F#. It provides a complete development environment for building web applications. React, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library developed by Facebook for building user interfaces. It focuses specifically on the frontend aspect of web development, allowing developers to create reusable UI components.

  2. Platform Independence: .NET is a cross-platform framework that allows developers to build applications that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a unified development experience across different platforms. React, on the other hand, is not a platform but a library that can be used on any platform that supports JavaScript. It is primarily used for building web applications and can be integrated with other frameworks and libraries to build full-stack applications.

  3. Server-Side vs. Client-Side: .NET is primarily used for server-side development, where the logic and processing are handled on the server. It provides a robust infrastructure for building scalable and secure web services and APIs. React, on the other hand, is primarily used for client-side development, where the user interface and user interactions are handled on the client's browser. It focuses on providing a seamless and responsive user experience.

  4. Performance and Scalability: .NET is known for its performance and scalability. It provides features like just-in-time compilation and memory management that optimize the performance of applications. It also supports horizontal scalability, allowing applications to handle increased traffic by adding more servers. React, on the other hand, is highly efficient in rendering complex user interfaces. It uses a virtual DOM algorithm that minimizes the number of updates to the actual DOM, resulting in faster rendering and improved performance.

  5. Development Speed and Productivity: .NET provides a wide range of built-in libraries, frameworks, and tools that simplify and accelerate the web development process. It offers features like scaffolding, automatic code generation, and integrated development environments that enhance developer productivity. React, on the other hand, promotes code reusability and component-based development, allowing developers to build complex UIs efficiently. It provides a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and packages that further speed up development.

  6. Learning Curve and Community Support: .NET has a steep learning curve, especially for beginners, due to its extensive documentation and complex architecture. However, it has a strong and active community that provides support and resources for developers. React, on the other hand, has a relatively easier learning curve, especially for JavaScript developers. It has a large and vibrant community with abundant resources, tutorials, and libraries that facilitate learning and development.

In Summary, .NET is a cross-platform framework primarily used for server-side development, offering performance, scalability, and productivity enhancements. React, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library focused on frontend development, offering efficient UI rendering, component reusability, and a large community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, React

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
React
React

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
182.6K
Followers
5.9K
Followers
147.0K
Votes
1.9K
Votes
4.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to .NET, React?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase