StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs React Native

.NET vs React Native

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
React Native
React Native
Stacks34.4K
Followers29.5K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars124.4K
Forks24.9K

.NET vs React Native: What are the differences?

.NET and React Native are two popular frameworks used for developing web and mobile applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Language and Platform: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft that primarily uses C# as the programming language and is designed for building applications on the Windows operating system. On the other hand, React Native is a JavaScript framework created by Facebook, which allows developers to build mobile applications for both iOS and Android platforms using the same codebase.

  2. Execution Environment: .NET applications are executed on the server-side, relying on a web server to process and respond to client requests. This makes .NET more suitable for building web applications with server-side rendering capabilities. Meanwhile, React Native applications are executed on the client-side within a JavaScript runtime environment, resulting in a faster and more responsive user interface.

  3. User Interface: .NET primarily uses server-side rendering, where the entire web page is generated on the server and then sent to the client for display. This approach provides better initial page loading times but may lead to slower subsequent interactions. React Native, on the other hand, uses a client-side rendering approach, where the user interface components are built and rendered directly on the client's device. This results in faster interactions and a more seamless user experience.

  4. Code Reusability: React Native offers a significant advantage in terms of code reusability. With React Native, developers can write a single codebase that can be used to build applications for both iOS and Android platforms. This reduces development effort and allows for faster implementation of new features or bug fixes across multiple platforms. In contrast, .NET requires separate codebases for different platforms, resulting in increased development and maintenance overhead.

  5. Performance: .NET applications are compiled into machine code, which allows for better performance optimization and execution speed. This makes .NET a preferred choice for high-performance applications that require heavy computations or real-time processing. React Native, being a JavaScript framework, relies on an interpreter to execute code, which may introduce some performance overhead compared to native applications.

  6. Ecosystem and Community Support: .NET has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and frameworks available for developers. It also benefits from the extensive community support and documentation provided by Microsoft and other developers. React Native, being an open-source framework, also has a vibrant ecosystem with a large community contributing to its development. However, compared to .NET, React Native's ecosystem is relatively younger, and the availability of specific libraries or tools may be limited in certain cases.

In summary, .NET is a server-side framework primarily used for building web applications on the Windows platform, while React Native is a client-side JavaScript framework used for developing mobile applications for both iOS and Android platforms. React Native offers better code reusability and a more responsive user interface, while .NET provides better performance optimization and benefits from a mature ecosystem with extensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, React Native

Nick
Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Andrea
Andrea

May 26, 2020

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsVue NativeVue NativeReactReact

I'm a huge fan of Vue.js and I'm pretty comfortable with it. I need to build a mobile app for my company and I was now wondering whether I could make use of VueJS with Vue Native instead of switching to React. I know Vue Native builds on top of RN. My question is whether I'd have as much freedom with Vue Native over RN and whether you feel like Vue Native is "production ready" or not. Not sure of which shortcomings I may find using Vue Native... Thanks a lot!!!

336k views336k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
React Native
React Native

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Native iOS Components;Asynchronous Execution;Touch Handling;Flexbox and Styling; Polyfills
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
124.4K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
24.9K
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
34.4K
Followers
5.9K
Followers
29.5K
Votes
1.9K
Votes
1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 214
    Learn once write everywhere
  • 174
    Cross platform
  • 169
    Javascript
  • 122
    Native ios components
  • 69
    Built by facebook
Cons
  • 24
    Javascript
  • 19
    Built by facebook
  • 12
    Cant use CSS
  • 4
    30 FPS Limit
  • 2
    Slow
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to .NET, React Native?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase