StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Saturn

.NET vs Saturn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Saturn
Saturn
Stacks8
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars724
Forks110

.NET vs Saturn: What are the differences?

  1. Application Type: The key difference between .NET and Saturn is in their application types. .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building Windows-based applications, while Saturn is a web development framework based on F#.
  2. Platform Compatibility: Another significant difference is their platform compatibility. .NET is primarily focused on Windows platforms and provides extensive cross-platform support, including macOS and Linux. On the other hand, Saturn is built on top of the ASP.NET Core framework, making it compatible with various platforms.
  3. Programming Language: .NET primarily supports languages such as C# and VB.NET, while Saturn is specifically designed for F# programming language. F# is a functional-first language that differs from the object-oriented approach of C#.
  4. Community Support: .NET has a vast community of developers, resources, and libraries due to its long history and industry support. However, Saturn, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community. This affects the availability of resources and support for developers using Saturn.
  5. Philosophy: .NET follows a more traditional approach to web development, focusing on Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) concepts. Saturn, on the other hand, aligns with the functional programming paradigm, emphasizing immutability and pure functions in web development.
  6. Ease of Use: .NET provides extensive tooling and documentation, making it relatively easier for developers to get started with building applications. Saturn, being more niche and specific to F# development, may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with the language and functional programming concepts.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET and Saturn lie in their application types, platform compatibility, supported programming languages, community support, development philosophy, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Saturn

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Saturn
Saturn

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It is a web development framework written in F# which implements the server-side MVC pattern. Many of its components and concepts will seem familiar to anyone with experience in other web frameworks like Ruby on Rails or Python’s Django.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Combines the well known MVC pattern with the power of FP and F# to make web programming fun and easy; Builds on top of highly optimized, and battle tested technologies such as ASP.NET Core, Giraffe and Kestrel; Provides set of tools, templates and guides that makes creating and maintaining applications seamlessly; created and maintained by well known members of the F# OSS Community and supported by industrial users
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
724
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
110
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
8
Followers
5.9K
Followers
9
Votes
1.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
No community feedback yet
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
Linux
Linux
SQLite
SQLite
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to .NET, Saturn?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase