StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Total.js

.NET vs Total.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.3K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446

.NET vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between .NET and Total.js, two popular web development frameworks.

  1. Language Support: .NET primarily supports languages such as C# and VB.NET, while Total.js supports JavaScript. This difference in supported languages can significantly impact the development process and the skill set required for developers.

  2. Scalability: .NET is known for its robust scalability features, making it suitable for large enterprise applications with high traffic volume. On the other hand, Total.js may not be as well-equipped for handling massive scalability requirements out of the box.

  3. Ecosystem and Tooling: .NET has a vast ecosystem and a wide array of tools available for developers, making the development process more streamlined and efficient. Total.js, while still offering a good set of tools, may not have the same level of extensive ecosystem support.

  4. Community and Support: .NET, with its large community and established presence in the industry, offers strong support in terms of documentation, forums, and resources. Total.js, being a newer player in the field, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for developers.

  5. Learning Curve: .NET, especially for beginners, may have a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and the need to master languages such as C#. Total.js, with its focus on JavaScript, may be more accessible to developers who are already familiar with the language.

In Summary, .NET and Total.js differ in their language support, scalability, ecosystem, community support, and learning curve, making each framework suitable for different types of projects and developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Total.js

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Total.js
Total.js

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
446
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
20
Followers
5.9K
Followers
62
Votes
1.9K
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 5
    Fast
  • 4
    Great support
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 3
    Prebuild apps
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Poor community
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
  • 2
    Developed as "one man show"
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry

What are some alternatives to .NET, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase